A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 4th 06, 03:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

James

Never heard of leading with rear engine to make sure it was running.
That procedure was to get you moving so the front prop wouldn't pick
up rocks and throw into rear prop. We used to carry a little *******
file (6 inches) and on pre flight if found a nick in prop leading edge
we ran file along edge to take nick out.

Big John
`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ```

On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:43:08 -0600, "Jim Macklin"
wrote:

But it happened several times. The fix was to issue a POH
change to require all take-offs lead with the rear throttle.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P


  #2  
Old June 2nd 06, 06:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 21:52:09 -0600, Big John
wrote:

James

Never heard of leading with rear engine to make sure it was running.
That procedure was to get you moving so the front prop wouldn't pick
up rocks and throw into rear prop. We used to carry a little *******


Doesn't everybody?

file (6 inches) and on pre flight if found a nick in prop leading edge


Errrr...Ahhhh...wait... that was a pooly selected insertion spot and
could lead one to the wrong interpetation.

But only a 6" file? They must have been little nicks. :-))

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

we ran file along edge to take nick out.

Big John
````````````````````````````````````````````````` ````

On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:43:08 -0600, "Jim Macklin"
wrote:

But it happened several times. The fix was to issue a POH
change to require all take-offs lead with the rear throttle.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

  #3  
Old June 2nd 06, 10:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

It is in the manual to use the rear engine first, to be sure
it is still running, I seem to remember it was a SB after
some accidents.

As to carrying a 6 inch file to dress prop nicks, that is
allowed ONLY for A&P [P actually] and requires a logbook
endorsement. There are strict allowances for the depth and
position of a nick that can be dressed and the nick must be
properly blended so there are no stress-risers.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Roger" wrote in message
...
| On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 21:52:09 -0600, Big John

| wrote:
|
| James
|
| Never heard of leading with rear engine to make sure it
was running.
| That procedure was to get you moving so the front prop
wouldn't pick
| up rocks and throw into rear prop. We used to carry a
little *******
|
| Doesn't everybody?
|
| file (6 inches) and on pre flight if found a nick in prop
leading edge
|
| Errrr...Ahhhh...wait... that was a pooly selected
insertion spot and
| could lead one to the wrong interpetation.
|
| But only a 6" file? They must have been little nicks.
:-))
|
| Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
| (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
| www.rogerhalstead.com
|
| we ran file along edge to take nick out.
|
| Big John
| ````````````````````````````````````````````````` ````
|
| On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:43:08 -0600, "Jim Macklin"
| wrote:
|
| But it happened several times. The fix was to issue a
POH
| change to require all take-offs lead with the rear
throttle.
|
|
| --
| James H. Macklin
| ATP,CFI,A&P


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! Enea Grande Owning 1 November 4th 03 12:57 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.