A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

filing IFR plan for VFR flight conditions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 8th 04, 10:02 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
...

Almost... Even *with* conflicting IFR traffic if you are not in
their airspace, VFR traffic is under no obligation to accept being
moved. No obligation to even be in communication with them at
all. If there's a conlict, the controller's last resort is to move the
IFR traffic and rely on "see and avoid" in VMC.


No, not "almost", what I wrote is exactly correct. The outer area
associated with Class C airspace is nonregulatory airspace surrounding
designated Class C airspace airports wherein ATC provides separation and
sequencing for all IFR and participating VFR aircraft. The outer area
extends outward 20 miles from the primary Class C airspace airport and
extends from the lower limits of radar/radio coverage up to the ceiling of
the approach control's delegated airspace, excluding the Class C airspace
proper. The same service is provided in the outer area as in the charted
Class C airspace, the only difference is participation is voluntary for VFR
aircraft in the outer area. If you elected to contact approach you
volunteered to participate. And, yes, ATC can move VFR traffic to provide
required separation from IFR traffic. If you're not in contact with ATC,
then you've obviously not volunteered to participate and no separation
mimima applies, so ATC will not move the IFR aircraft to resolve a conflict,
just issue a traffic advisory.


  #2  
Old May 8th 04, 11:48 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


And, yes, ATC can move VFR traffic to provide
required separation from IFR traffic.


But (in the outer area) that VFR traffic can decline to be moved, and thus
withdraw their voluteering for radar services.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #3  
Old May 9th 04, 12:03 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

But (in the outer area) that VFR traffic can decline to be moved,
and thus withdraw their voluteering for radar services.


Roger, radar service terminated, squawk VFR, have a nice day.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Logging approaches Ron Garrison Instrument Flight Rules 109 March 2nd 04 05:54 PM
FAA letter on flight into known icing C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 78 December 22nd 03 07:44 PM
Sim time loggable? [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 12 December 6th 03 07:47 AM
IFR flight plan filing question Tune2828 Instrument Flight Rules 2 July 23rd 03 03:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.