![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Jay Honeck posted:
I find it supremely ironic that the ultimate solution to our problems in the Middle East, as well as the ultimate solution to our so-called climate crisis, is being politically quashed by the same people who are screaming the loudest against burning petrochemical fuels. I find off-hand comments about "ultimate solutions" a bit concerning. Care to elaborate? Electricity created with nuclear fission can be used to create all sorts of alternative fuels, from clean-burning hydrogen, to ethanol. For reasons that are clear only to the activists themselves, dirty and dangerous coal -- and politically unstable oil and natural gas -- are seen as "safer" than nuclear energy. Thanks for the clarification! Not that I think that the solution is all that simple. Technically speaking, I agree that nuclear fission offers a more efficient and less poluting source of energy than burning fossil fuels. However, practically speaking, the process of obtaining nuclear fuel and containing the waste (we have no real way to "dispose" of it) is problematic, even disregarding issues presented by those with malicious intent. At this point in time, these problems more than offset the benefits. Lest someone gets the wrong impression, I am not an "anti-nuclear" activist. But, I *do* live in Ohio, downwind from the plant that nearly had a hole eaten through the reactor lid, and therefore have an interest in the way that situation is being dealt with (yes, it's not over yet, folks!). Thus, when these very same "environmentalists" protest against the use of non-renewable energy (oil, coal, gas) and "global warming" it's impossible to take them seriously. Their actions speak far louder than their words. Is this really an either/or issue, though? We could solve our problems in the same way that they're solved in other countries; tax the heck out of gas. How many Hummers with one person in them would we see on the road if gas was $7.00 a gallon? As I see it, our biggest problem is that we squander non-renewable energy sources. Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: The Winnie Mae of Oklahoma airplane decanter | cowboy67 | Owning | 0 | February 12th 05 06:09 AM |
Oklahoma City - Flight Planning Question | Art Varrassi | Piloting | 10 | November 23rd 04 03:06 AM |
CVS AnyWhereMap in Eastern Oklahoma | sidk | Home Built | 0 | October 22nd 04 12:40 AM |
CVS AnyWhereMap in Eastern Oklahoma | sidk | Piloting | 0 | October 22nd 04 12:40 AM |
Registration of Aircraft in Oklahoma City | Larry Smith | Home Built | 2 | November 10th 03 05:07 PM |