![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron A. wrote:
Everyone seems to agree that that FAR 43 requires a maintenance log entry when updating the database. And everyone agrees that it is silly. What date do you put down for the maintenance ( I know the obvious answer - the date you did it)? If I update multiple planes this weekend with the database that will be effective in the middle of the week (Mar 16th) because it is more convenient to go to the airport on a weekend, is it smart to put I updated the databases before they are effective if they have an IFR flight before the 16th? GNS480 makes it easy. You can update the database before the effective date, both the current and future databases are stored on the card, and the GNS480 automatically switches to the new database on the effective date. I haven't been around and the precise moment when it switches to know whether the switching disrupts a flight in progress. ![]() I understand you can legally fly an approach with an expired database if the approach has not been modified since the last database revision. My That's true only if your Approved Flight Manual Supplement permits it. Believe it or not, they're not all the same. If you have a UPS/Garmin-AT, the boilerplate FMS they shipped you, and you probably sent off to OK City without modifying it, and OK City approved without modifying it, allows you to fly an approach if you verify it is unchanged. OTOH if you have a Garmin(not-AT) the boilerplate that they shipped to you, and you probably sent off to OK City withoutodifying it, and OK City approved without modifying it, requires you to have a current data base. Not sure what happens with other brands. Also not sure if you could have modified the boilerplate and had it approved. understanding is you couldn't verify if the approach had changed until you wait close enough to the cycle data to get the paper charts and see if they changed anything. If they changed it on the future cycle and it affected your approach before the effective date (you can download 10 days ahead, before you receive the paper) could FSDO bring enforcement? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |