A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FSDO enforcement- GPS before effective date - which date to put in Aircraft Log for Part 43?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 10th 06, 10:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FSDO enforcement- GPS before effective date - which date toput in Aircraft Log for Part 43?

Ron A. wrote:
Everyone seems to agree that that FAR 43 requires a maintenance log entry
when updating the database. And everyone agrees that it is silly.

What date do you put down for the maintenance ( I know the obvious answer -
the date you did it)? If I update multiple planes this weekend with the
database that will be effective in the middle of the week (Mar 16th) because
it is more convenient to go to the airport on a weekend, is it smart to put
I updated the databases before they are effective if they have an IFR flight
before the 16th?


GNS480 makes it easy. You can update the database before the effective date,
both the current and future databases are stored on the card, and the GNS480
automatically switches to the new database on the effective date. I haven't been
around and the precise moment when it switches to know whether the switching
disrupts a flight in progress.


I understand you can legally fly an approach with an expired database if the
approach has not been modified since the last database revision. My


That's true only if your Approved Flight Manual Supplement permits it. Believe
it or not, they're not all the same. If you have a UPS/Garmin-AT, the
boilerplate FMS they shipped you, and you probably sent off to OK City without
modifying it, and OK City approved without modifying it, allows you to fly an
approach if you verify it is unchanged.

OTOH if you have a Garmin(not-AT) the boilerplate that they shipped to you, and
you probably sent off to OK City withoutodifying it, and OK City approved
without modifying it, requires you to have a current data base.

Not sure what happens with other brands.

Also not sure if you could have modified the boilerplate and had it approved.

understanding is you couldn't verify if the approach had changed until you
wait close enough to the cycle data to get the paper charts and see if they
changed anything. If they changed it on the future cycle and it affected
your approach before the effective date (you can download 10 days ahead,
before you receive the paper) could FSDO bring enforcement?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 1 January 2nd 04 09:02 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 2nd 03 03:07 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.