Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11

"Wake UP!" wrote:

The yellow color implies a molten-metal
temperature of approximately 1000 oC, evidently above that which the dark-
smoke hydrocarbon fires in the Towers could produce. If aluminum (e.g.,
from the plane) had melted, it would melt and flow away from the heat
source at its melting point of about 650 oC and thus would not reach the
yellow color observed for this molten metal. Thus, molten aluminum is in
fact ruled out with high probability.

Bullcrap. Molten aluminum at about 1,100 to 1,200 F glows yellow
nicely, and if it was dribbling downward from where it was melting, you
would see much the same effect as in those photos.

"Scott M. Kozel" wrote in
:

"Wake UP!" wrote:

The yellow color implies a molten-metal
temperature of approximately 1000 oC, evidently above that which the
dark- smoke hydrocarbon fires in the Towers could produce. If
aluminum (e.g., from the plane) had melted, it would melt and flow
away from the heat source at its melting point of about 650 oC and
thus would not reach the yellow color observed for this molten metal.
Thus, molten aluminum is in fact ruled out with high probability.

Bullcrap. Molten aluminum at about 1,100 to 1,200 F glows yellow
nicely, and if it was dribbling downward from where it was melting,
you would see much the same effect as in those photos.



If what you say is true, then consider emailing Dr Jones with your evidence
and he will certainly update his paper

Wake Up! wrote:

If what you say is true, then consider emailing Dr Jones with your evidence
and he will certainly update his paper

LOL
It isn't too difficult for Dr Jones to actually research this himself

mrtravel wrote in
. com:

Wake Up! wrote:

If what you say is true, then consider emailing Dr Jones with your
evidence and he will certainly update his paper

LOL
It isn't too difficult for Dr Jones to actually research this himself




Obviously, he did.

Wake Up! wrote:

mrtravel wrote in
. com:


Wake Up! wrote:


If what you say is true, then consider emailing Dr Jones with your
evidence and he will certainly update his paper

LOL
It isn't too difficult for Dr Jones to actually research this himself


Obviously, he did.

And yet he still came to the wrong conclusions, as did you

mrtravel wrote in news:5MLQf.75273$PL5.59656
@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com:

Wake Up! wrote:

mrtravel wrote in
. com:


Wake Up! wrote:


If what you say is true, then consider emailing Dr Jones with your
evidence and he will certainly update his paper

LOL
It isn't too difficult for Dr Jones to actually research this himself


Obviously, he did.

And yet he still came to the wrong conclusions, as did you




and where is the evidence showing he came to the wrong conclusion? And
where is the evidence for your conclusion? Be specific.

Wake Up! wrote:

and where is the evidence showing he came to the wrong conclusion? And
where is the evidence for your conclusion? Be specific.

There is plenty of evidence, you just choose to ignore anything/anyone
that doesn't agree with you. Remember the pilots that stated an
airliner could be flown by amateurs into the WTC. You ignored their
comments, didn't you?

Didn't you also say you were "finished" a long time ago when you posted
as TRUTH?

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:18:27 GMT, "Wake Up!" wrote:

And yet he still came to the wrong conclusions, as did you


and where is the evidence showing he came to the wrong conclusion? And
where is the evidence for your conclusion? Be specific.

You are not automatically right in science, requiring others to prove you
wrong; science doesn't work that way. If he can't convince civil engineers that
he is correct, he is the one that failed, not they.

But you can always prop up your delusions with the knowledge that Jones got
his paper published in a book of economic and policital articles about 9/11. I'm
willing to bet that you'll be waiting for a cold day in hell before he gets
published in a peer reviewed journal concerning structural engineering.

The troll comes back under the new name of "Wake Up!" and complained:

and where is the evidence showing he came to the wrong conclusion? And
where is the evidence for your conclusion? Be specific.


Here ya go:

http://tinyurl.com/nmh55


Your job is to now prove that this plan was possible by providing the
name of each conspirator.



-hh

In article , says...
mrtravel wrote in news:5MLQf.75273$PL5.59656
@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com:

Wake Up! wrote:

mrtravel wrote in
. com:


Wake Up! wrote:


If what you say is true, then consider emailing Dr Jones with your
evidence and he will certainly update his paper

LOL
It isn't too difficult for Dr Jones to actually research this himself


Obviously, he did.

And yet he still came to the wrong conclusions, as did you




and where is the evidence showing he came to the wrong conclusion? And
where is the evidence for your conclusion? Be specific.

Thermite reactions (unless very carefully controlled) - are not
"explosions" - FULLSTOP! The video footage clearly shows a large
explosion.


--
Duncan