A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

wide wingspan and good lift to drag ratios



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 12th 06, 06:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default wide wingspan and good lift to drag ratios

In article .com,
"Tony" wrote:

I suspected most "lift" or at least delta momentum was generated near
the leading edge, so having a long chord didn't contribute much at low
airspeeds.

I do appreciate the effects of the burble or vortex at the wing ends
and the advantages of winglets, at least at higher air speeds.



High aspect ratio reduces induced drag, which helps aircraft flying at
slow indicated airspeed.

The formula is: CDi = CL**2/(pi*A*e), whe

CDi = induced drag coefficient
CL = lift coefficient
pi = 3.141759..........
A = aspect ratio = wingspan**2/wing area
e = wing shape efficiency (elliptical lift distribution is best;
constant chord is least)
  #2  
Old March 12th 06, 07:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default wide wingspan and good lift to drag ratios

If I'm reading this right induced lift for constant area is inversely
proportional to span, and goes up linearly with area.

At more or less constant chord, area is linear with span, so the idea
would be to have chord go down as span goes up. I'd guess e starts
changing as the wing grows too slender.

That pretty much gives me what I wanted to know. I'd guess higher order
terms have to come into play with increasing airspeed.

Thanks

Tony

  #3  
Old March 13th 06, 01:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default wide wingspan and good lift to drag ratios

In article .com,
"Tony" wrote:

If I'm reading this right induced lift for constant area is inversely
proportional to span, and goes up linearly with area.

At more or less constant chord, area is linear with span, so the idea
would be to have chord go down as span goes up. I'd guess e starts
changing as the wing grows too slender.

That pretty much gives me what I wanted to know. I'd guess higher order
terms have to come into play with increasing airspeed.

Thanks

Tony


Only partially correct. Induced drag goes up inversely with the square
of span, and directly with area.

The efficiency factor, e, is a lift distribution (wing shape) factor,
being, theoretically, 1.0 for a wing with elliptical lift distribution
and reducing in magnitude for tapered distributions and constant chord.

Bear in mind, e can be tricked into higher efficiencies by varying the
angle of incidence or changing the airfoil shape from root to tip, so it
*may* not represent an elliptical planform.

Flutter problems may arise with wings that have long spans and narrow
chord, so everything you do is a compromise.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.