![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Tony" wrote: I suspected most "lift" or at least delta momentum was generated near the leading edge, so having a long chord didn't contribute much at low airspeeds. I do appreciate the effects of the burble or vortex at the wing ends and the advantages of winglets, at least at higher air speeds. High aspect ratio reduces induced drag, which helps aircraft flying at slow indicated airspeed. The formula is: CDi = CL**2/(pi*A*e), whe CDi = induced drag coefficient CL = lift coefficient pi = 3.141759.......... A = aspect ratio = wingspan**2/wing area e = wing shape efficiency (elliptical lift distribution is best; constant chord is least) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I'm reading this right induced lift for constant area is inversely
proportional to span, and goes up linearly with area. At more or less constant chord, area is linear with span, so the idea would be to have chord go down as span goes up. I'd guess e starts changing as the wing grows too slender. That pretty much gives me what I wanted to know. I'd guess higher order terms have to come into play with increasing airspeed. Thanks Tony |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Tony" wrote: If I'm reading this right induced lift for constant area is inversely proportional to span, and goes up linearly with area. At more or less constant chord, area is linear with span, so the idea would be to have chord go down as span goes up. I'd guess e starts changing as the wing grows too slender. That pretty much gives me what I wanted to know. I'd guess higher order terms have to come into play with increasing airspeed. Thanks Tony Only partially correct. Induced drag goes up inversely with the square of span, and directly with area. The efficiency factor, e, is a lift distribution (wing shape) factor, being, theoretically, 1.0 for a wing with elliptical lift distribution and reducing in magnitude for tapered distributions and constant chord. Bear in mind, e can be tricked into higher efficiencies by varying the angle of incidence or changing the airfoil shape from root to tip, so it *may* not represent an elliptical planform. Flutter problems may arise with wings that have long spans and narrow chord, so everything you do is a compromise. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|