If WTC 7 came down from fire and debris ..

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:54:59 GMT, TRUTH wrote:

Roger wrote in
:

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:27:32 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:

silliness Snip

Back to this silliness again.
Do you trust pre positioned explosives to go off as planned when there
is a rather large raging fire in the structure ?

There was a good documentary on this with engineers explaining how the
building design failed under unexpected circumstances and did so in a
plain language explanation even the most diehard conspiracy theorist
would have difficulty explaining away. However there are those who
make up their minds and do not want to be confused with facts.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com




They obviously did so without examining all the evidence.

I rest my case :-))

And as there is no reason to follow this any farther.
Thread Plonk

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

In article ,
on Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:01:07 -0500,
Roger attempted to say .....

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:27:32 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:

silliness Snip

Back to this silliness again.
Do you trust pre positioned explosives to go off as planned when there is a
rather large raging fire in the structure ?

There was a good documentary on this with engineers explaining how the
building design failed under unexpected circumstances and did so in a
plain language explanation even the most diehard conspiracy theorist
would have difficulty explaining away. However there are those who
make up their minds and do not want to be confused with facts.


So very true.


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

TRUTH wrote:

" wrote in
oups.com:


TRUTH wrote:

then why did the leaseholder say....


"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander,
telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain
the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe
the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to
pull and we watched the building collapse

Because he had decide to abandon any attempt to preserve the
building and was willing to pull any efforts to do so.



"Pull" is an industry term that means professionally demolish, as is
confirmed by this clip from the same PBS documentary:
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/vide.../pull_wtc6.wmv


Pull has multiple meanings.
YOUR meaning makes no sense in the context of his sentence.
Clearly what ever "pull" he was talking about, he was talking about it
after the event. He wasn't indicating it to be the cause.

mrtravel wrote in news:7z8Sf.56908$Jd.7047
@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net:

TRUTH wrote:

" wrote in
oups.com:


TRUTH wrote:

then why did the leaseholder say....


"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander,
telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain
the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe
the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to
pull and we watched the building collapse

Because he had decide to abandon any attempt to preserve the
building and was willing to pull any efforts to do so.



"Pull" is an industry term that means professionally demolish, as is
confirmed by this clip from the same PBS documentary:
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/vide.../pull_wtc6.wmv


Pull has multiple meanings.
YOUR meaning makes no sense in the context of his sentence.
Clearly what ever "pull" he was talking about, he was talking about it
after the event. He wasn't indicating it to be the cause.



It makes perfect sense. And if you heard it in any situation other than
9/11, it would make sense to you to. You need to put all the information
into context