![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... No? No. What about I'm assigned 5000, and I'm level at 5000. I request a "cruise 7000" and am granted that request. ("347FB cruise seven thousand"). Why would you request a descent and approach clearance if all you wanted was to climb from 5000 to 7000? If you want a higher altitude, ask for a higher altitude. 1: is this an improper request? (never mind whether it will accomplish what anybody thinks I want to accomplish) Yes. 2: Is it improper to give me "347FB cruise seven thousand" when I'm level at 5000? Yes. 3: If the answer to the above are "no", then how do I get to 7000 without climbing? (and without drugs) Regardless of the answer to the above, you cannot get to 7000 from 5000 without climbing. If you want to get from 5000 to 7000 then request 7000, don't request a descent and approach clearance. I advise you to get off the drugs. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What about I'm assigned 5000, and I'm level at 5000. I request a "cruise 7000" and am granted that request. ("347FB cruise seven thousand"). Why would you request a descent and approach clearance if all you wanted was to climb from 5000 to 7000? If you want a higher altitude, ask for a higher altitude. I didn't say that "all I wanted" was to climb... I said what my ATC request was, and gave no indication as to why. When I ask ATC for a clearance, they don't ask me why. But to give you one scenario, I'm at 5000, nearing my destination, and there's a big bad cloud in front of me which goes from 2000 to 6000. I don't want to enter the cloud because I'm afraid of the dark. Or maybe there's ice. Or maybe my passenger's uncomfortable. Or maybe I just want to test the system. Or maybe it's for training. So, a "cruise 7000" lets me climb over this cloud, and then descend back down to 5000, and then descend to my destination and do the approach (where the conditions are 800-2, but it's a nice cloud, not a big bad cloud, and I've already pushed my passenger overboard anyway) 1: is this an improper request? (never mind whether it will accomplish what anybody thinks I want to accomplish) Yes. Why is the request =improper=? (again, never mind whether it accomplishes what you may think I want to accomplish) And why would granting it be improper? you cannot get to 7000 from 5000 without climbing. [...] I advise you to get off the drugs. What do you think the drugs are for? ![]() Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... I didn't say that "all I wanted" was to climb... I said what my ATC request was, and gave no indication as to why. When I ask ATC for a clearance, they don't ask me why. But they do assume you understand what you're requesting. But to give you one scenario, I'm at 5000, nearing my destination, and there's a big bad cloud in front of me which goes from 2000 to 6000. I don't want to enter the cloud because I'm afraid of the dark. If you're afraid to enter clouds there's no reason for you to pursue an instrument rating and this will never be an issue for you. A cruise clearance is an IFR function. What do you think the drugs are for? ![]() Recreation. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But they do assume you understand what you're requesting.
I do. I am at 5000 feet. I am requesting a clearance which will allow me to climb to 7000, stay there a while, go back down to 5000 feet, and go even lower, even down to the ground at my destination. Does "cruise 7000" not allow me to do that? If you're afraid to enter clouds there's no reason for you to pursue an instrument rating... There are some clouds that nobody should penetrate. There are some clouds a cherokee shouldn't penetrate. There are some clouds my mind will never penetrate. And there are some occasions where, even though a cloud is benign, I would prefer not to enter it. Early in my IFR career, I saw lightning in a cloud right in front of me, a cloud that was no more than 2000 feet thick. It made no sense to me, but I wasn't going to enter something like that that made no sense to me. I asked for and got a clearance above it, and found out that what I was seeing was the lightning from a thunderstorm a hundred miles ahead, at night, which lit up the cloud in front of me. I learned something that day. It happens, despite evidence to the contrary. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... I do. How can you be sure? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 195 | November 28th 05 10:06 PM |
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U | Judah | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | February 27th 04 06:02 PM |
Q about lost comms on weird clearance | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 34 | February 2nd 04 09:11 PM |
Picking up a Clearance Airborne | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 03 01:31 AM |
Big John Bites Dicks (Security Clearance) | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 27 | August 21st 03 12:40 AM |