![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think....
If YOU are going to fly it, I'll bet $10 you'd have no problems. Buuuuuuuut, I'M not going to try! ;) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert You didn't give much data but I probably would have flown the bird home. A bird will fly with one aileron fine if you are careful and fuel is balanced for takeoff and landing. I have flown some of my model airplanes with one aileron and they do fine. One racer I built, only put one aileron on it to reduce drag from aileron movement and pick up a few mph. Also flew an 0-1 home in VN (100+ miles) with half the horizontal stab and elevator cut off and duct taped due to damage caused by wind blowing the parked bird (one of my FAC's parked not me) into a 55 gallon drum used as part of a revetment. Also with half the lateral control surface on your bird (and me aboard) I would have been careful and only made shallow banks and a long flat approach. I also would have not pulled bird off but accelerated to plenty of airspeed on take off. Enough said. Mark me in the column as flying home. Big John `````````````````````````````````````````` On 21 Mar 2006 16:02:44 -0800, "Robert M. Gary" wrote: http://www.thegaryhouse.com/aircraftdamage/ I was down in a remote area of Mexico this last weekend and a truck backed into my aileron. I was lucky that the driver had a sat phone and I was able to call an A&P to come down to Mexico and swap it for me. However, all the local pilots, and the A&P who came down seemed to think it would have flown ok as was. From a simply academic point of view I"m curious what you guys think. -Robert |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
http://www.thegaryhouse.com/aircraftdamage/ I was down in a remote area of Mexico this last weekend and a truck backed into my aileron. I was lucky that the driver had a sat phone and I was able to call an A&P to come down to Mexico and swap it for me. However, all the local pilots, and the A&P who came down seemed to think it would have flown ok as was. From a simply academic point of view I"m curious what you guys think. -Robert Robert, It would have flown, poorly. You would have had to hold right aileron to keep it strait. High speed characteristics would be un-known. You did the right thing getting replaced. Michelle (A&P) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your alive so you must of made the right decision.
Who cares if it would of flown. You were able to fix it before you flew it. Good job. "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... http://www.thegaryhouse.com/aircraftdamage/ I was down in a remote area of Mexico this last weekend and a truck backed into my aileron. I was lucky that the driver had a sat phone and I was able to call an A&P to come down to Mexico and swap it for me. However, all the local pilots, and the A&P who came down seemed to think it would have flown ok as was. From a simply academic point of view I"m curious what you guys think. -Robert |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert M. Gary wrote: http://www.thegaryhouse.com/aircraftdamage/ I was down in a remote area of Mexico this last weekend and a truck backed into my aileron. I was lucky that the driver had a sat phone and I was able to call an A&P to come down to Mexico and swap it for me. However, all the local pilots, and the A&P who came down seemed to think it would have flown ok as was. From a simply academic point of view I"m curious what you guys think. Nowadays I'd wait for repairs but a neighbour spent 5 years driving various two and four engined bombers over Occupied Europe and had a series of photos of just how little you -really- need in the way of contol surfaces |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message news ![]() "Dudley Henriques" wrote Just looking at the photo, I would have been concerned about the outer attach point for possible post impact misalignment that might under load cause an issue, I'm with you, and a little more; the attach point would need a good inspection, and I would also want to trace all the rigging back to the yoke, to see if any other fittings or bearings or bellcranks or rods were damaged. That might take a bit of time, to expose all of that. -- Jim in NC You just never know about these "little bang jobs". There's an old saying in the fighter business. Treat every pilot you meet in the air as though he was better than you until he shows you by his actions that he isn't. Same goes for a damage decision. You should treat it as though it's serious until it's proven that it's not . This philosophy has managed to get me all the way through a career in one piece. There just might be something to it :-)) Dudley |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "NW_PILOT" wrote I think it would have done OK! Yeah, I really trust your judgment. -- Jim in NC |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A ferry permit could be issued for such a
condition and an inspection for range of motion, security, etc signed of by an A mechanic and of course it would be finally up to the pilot whether to fly. I would not want to fly it IFR, most ferry permits only allow Day/VFR. One of the reasons I didn't want to try for the permit is because I just don't know what the procedure would have been, but I expect it would have taken months. The initial inspection would have had to have been done by an A&E and then approved by Mexico City. However, then comes the custom's duties, etc. Finally, I'd need an A&P to look at it before I entered the U.S. (or right after entering, I don't recall). So I kept very, very quiet about it. I didn't tell the Mexicans about it and didn't mention anything to U.S. customs.I believe that technically both the A&P and I could have both been arrested since I believe it is totally illegal for an A&P to do any major repair without an A&E present. I guess I got lucky that the guy who hit me had a sat phone on him. Otherwise I would have been faced with the decision. Either fly it out of there as-is or abandon the plane there. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Big John" wrote)
[snip] Enough said. Mark me in the column as flying home. Would you have removed the damaged aileron before flight? Montblack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cirrus chute deployment -- an incredible story | Michael182/G | Instrument Flight Rules | 48 | July 14th 05 03:52 PM |
My first lesson | Marco Rispoli | Aerobatics | 3 | May 17th 05 08:23 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |