Inertial reel shoulder harness - retro fit?

I've decided to opt for the B.A.S. system for the SkyHawk. In response
to the post about the reel breaking down and the belt then being useless --
I find lots of testimonial about how the shoulder harness prevented serious,
perhaps even fatal, injury and nothing about the reels breaking down.
My problem with the fixed length, is that even with the belt loosened to
its max length, I can't reach the fuel selector valve on the floor. With it
cinched down for take off, I can't touch the instrument panel with my finger
tips and its all I can do to keep the throttle all the way in with only one
finger pushing on it.
The last thing I'd want to contend with if the whirly thing quit, is
unfastening that belt to get to the valve and then buckling it back up
before making an off field landing if I couldn't get the noise maker back in
operation.
Ross, thanks for the positive response. Too bad there's no competition
for B.A.S. to get the price down.

Go Fly!

Of all the things to worry about in a plane it makes about as much sense
is where the prop stops on shutdown.



Casey Wilson wrote:

I've decided to opt for the B.A.S. system for the SkyHawk. In response
to the post about the reel breaking down and the belt then being useless --
I find lots of testimonial about how the shoulder harness prevented serious,
perhaps even fatal, injury and nothing about the reels breaking down.
My problem with the fixed length, is that even with the belt loosened to
its max length, I can't reach the fuel selector valve on the floor. With it
cinched down for take off, I can't touch the instrument panel with my finger
tips and its all I can do to keep the throttle all the way in with only one
finger pushing on it.
The last thing I'd want to contend with if the whirly thing quit, is
unfastening that belt to get to the valve and then buckling it back up
before making an off field landing if I couldn't get the noise maker back in
operation.
Ross, thanks for the positive response. Too bad there's no competition
for B.A.S. to get the price down.

Go Fly!

Granted that engine failure (stopping the whirly thing up front) is
uncommon it happens often enough that we drill on it in primary training,
flight reviews, and.... And every POH I've seen, certainly not all by a
long shot, has a check list for engine failure in various scenarios. If
something impedes me performing the check list ... Yeah, I worry about it.
Or did I miss your point, Newps?


"Newps" wrote in message
...
Of all the things to worry about in a plane it makes about as much sense
is where the prop stops on shutdown.



Casey Wilson wrote:

I've decided to opt for the B.A.S. system for the SkyHawk. In
response to the post about the reel breaking down and the belt then being
useless -- I find lots of testimonial about how the shoulder harness
prevented serious, perhaps even fatal, injury and nothing about the reels
breaking down.
My problem with the fixed length, is that even with the belt loosened
to its max length, I can't reach the fuel selector valve on the floor.
With it cinched down for take off, I can't touch the instrument panel
with my finger tips and its all I can do to keep the throttle all the way
in with only one finger pushing on it.
The last thing I'd want to contend with if the whirly thing quit, is
unfastening that belt to get to the valve and then buckling it back up
before making an off field landing if I couldn't get the noise maker back
in operation.
Ross, thanks for the positive response. Too bad there's no
competition for B.A.S. to get the price down.

Go Fly!

Casey Wilson wrote:
Granted that engine failure (stopping the whirly thing up front) is
uncommon it happens often enough that we drill on it in primary training,
flight reviews, and.... And every POH I've seen, certainly not all by a
long shot, has a check list for engine failure in various scenarios. If
something impedes me performing the check list ... Yeah, I worry about it.
Or did I miss your point, Newps?

Yes, you did. My point was some people worry about the inertia reel
itself failing.

"Newps" wrote in message
...


Casey Wilson wrote:
Granted that engine failure (stopping the whirly thing up front) is
uncommon it happens often enough that we drill on it in primary training,
flight reviews, and.... And every POH I've seen, certainly not all by a
long shot, has a check list for engine failure in various scenarios. If
something impedes me performing the check list ... Yeah, I worry about
it.
Or did I miss your point, Newps?

Yes, you did. My point was some people worry about the inertia reel
itself failing.

Ah, now I get it. My mistake.

Casey Wilson wrote:
snip
Ross, thanks for the positive response. Too bad there's no competition
for B.A.S. to get the price down.

If you're looking for an alternative to BAS inertial reels, try these
guys (just try to look past the horrible website design...)

http://www.davisaircraftproducts.com/

They'll build to suit, and their products are STC'd (not just FAA/PMA
approved).

The only downside is that they won't give you a quote (even a "ballpark
number") until you give them all the specs and they work up the exact
design, including prints, and get your approval on them. Don't ask me why.

-Doug

--------------------
Doug Vetter, ATP/CFI

http://www.dvatp.com
--------------------

"Doug Vetter" wrote in message
...

If you're looking for an alternative to BAS inertial reels, try these guys
(just try to look past the horrible website design...)

http://www.davisaircraftproducts.com/



Got another web address for them that one doesn't seem to work.

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message
...

"Doug Vetter" wrote in message
...

If you're looking for an alternative to BAS inertial reels, try these
guys (just try to look past the horrible website design...)

http://www.davisaircraftproducts.com/



Got another web address for them that one doesn't seem to work.

Hi,

It worked for me. As was stated, the web site is dreadful regarding
navigation. The inertial reels are in section 7, then click on 2.

"Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in message
news:r4AUf.5045$hC.2708@trnddc08...

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message
...

"Doug Vetter" wrote in message
...

If you're looking for an alternative to BAS inertial reels, try these
guys (just try to look past the horrible website design...)

http://www.davisaircraftproducts.com/



Got another web address for them that one doesn't seem to work.

Hi,

It worked for me. As was stated, the web site is dreadful regarding
navigation. The inertial reels are in section 7, then click on 2.


I still get a "This Page Cannot Be Displayed" which is a server or DNS
error. Maybe it hasn't propagated to all the DNS servers yet.

I guess I paid about $750.00 for the two belts and the mechanic charge
$80.00 to install. I do not know what the cost is now. I got a reduced
price because the two retractors had a different tension between the
two. Who is going to know? They also sell a little sleeve that goes on
the nylon web that protects your neck when you do not have a collered
shirt on.

Casey Wilson wrote:

I've decided to opt for the B.A.S. system for the SkyHawk. In response
to the post about the reel breaking down and the belt then being useless --
I find lots of testimonial about how the shoulder harness prevented serious,
perhaps even fatal, injury and nothing about the reels breaking down.
My problem with the fixed length, is that even with the belt loosened to
its max length, I can't reach the fuel selector valve on the floor. With it
cinched down for take off, I can't touch the instrument panel with my finger
tips and its all I can do to keep the throttle all the way in with only one
finger pushing on it.
The last thing I'd want to contend with if the whirly thing quit, is
unfastening that belt to get to the valve and then buckling it back up
before making an off field landing if I couldn't get the noise maker back in
operation.
Ross, thanks for the positive response. Too bad there's no competition
for B.A.S. to get the price down.

Go Fly!