![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many years ago I was parked in my car near the approach (ILS
Rwy 4 at SPI) with the weather at about 400-1. I saw an ANG F84F fighter breakout at 400 feet, well to the side of the runway in a 50 degree bank. Just go to the NASA website and look up the incident by case number. Sounds like a general and possible screwup. A missed approach on an ILS should always be done if the needle even reaches the full scale, because you have no idea how far off scale you are at that point. http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/ -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. wrote in message ups.com... | Someone mailed me the following incident the other day. I suspect it's | a satirical work, not factual - I mean, it can't happen real-time like | this ![]() jest? Here's | what was mailed: | | NASA ASRS Incident #294800, Atlanta, GA (ATL): | ------------------------------------ | Crew: Two-man crew, Captain (CAPT) and First Officer (FO); report | submitted | by FO | Aircraft: MDT (Medium Transport, 30,001 - 60,000 lbs); large turboprop | Flight Conditions: IMC; apparent ceiling 200 ft | ILS Approach Min: 200 ft ceiling and 3/8 mi visibility | | CAPT was PF (pilot flying). On Approach (APCH) into ATL, the aircraft | was | stabilized one mile outside Final Approach Fix (FAF) at 2,700 ft MSL. | Aircraft flew through the Localizer (LOC), overcompensated and flew | through | the LOC again at the Marker. Once the Marker light illuminated the Gear | Down/Landing Checklist, to the line, was called. FO proceeded with the | Landing Checklist and called out the major deviations. | * FO: several "wild excursions" ensued. | * At 400 ft AGL, FO stated: "We were full-scale Right of LOC and on | Glide | Slope (GS)." | * At a point above 200 ft AGL, FO called Go-Around (GAR). | * At 200 ft AGL, FO: "We broke out well Right of the Runway (RWY) and | adjacent to the Touchdown Zone (TDZ). | * The CAPT called for GAR; FO pushed up the Power. | * CAPT called: "No, I got the RWY made." | Landing (LNDG) was made after "several wild banks and ensuing jest by | the | Tower (TWR)." | FO self-evaluation: | * "I should have been more assertive as an FO"; and | * I never should have allowed the APCH to pass the first deviation | after | missing the LOC." | | | Ramapriya | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 1 | April 9th 04 11:25 PM |
Germany Lost the War... So What? | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 55 | February 26th 04 08:51 AM |
What about the AIM-54 Pheonix Missile? | Flub | Military Aviation | 26 | October 5th 03 05:34 AM |