![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One could also make the argument that a follow-on to AIM-54 isn't
required--threat is gone and the fact that the system was never used in combat during its life cycle would indicate that other weapons would have a higher priority for budget $$. Except it was of course much used in combat during the Iran-Iraq war, with some 60-70 victories claimed for the AIM-54 missile. jok |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jukka O. Kauppinen wrote: One could also make the argument that a follow-on to AIM-54 isn't required--threat is gone and the fact that the system was never used in combat during its life cycle would indicate that other weapons would have a higher priority for budget $$. Except it was of course much used in combat during the Iran-Iraq war, with some 60-70 victories claimed for the AIM-54 missile. jok Good point... Iranian use is not as talked about in the west as USN use, but it is an interesting look at the F-14A. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|