![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message
... [...] Oddly enough, in reviewing the certification requirements, I found two paragraphs that my own airplane doesn't appear to meet. Very interesting. Well, I had a chance to ask my mechanic about this today. Unfortunately, he wasn't completely certain about the answer either. However, it *appears* that it's related to the original type certificate being issued under CAR 3, rather than FAR 23. The thing that he couldn't figure out (nor could I) is that on the TC Data Sheet says (for my airplane type) "Certification Basis: 1. 14 CFR Part 23, 18 December 1964, Amendments 23-1 to and including 23-23, Subparts A, B, D, E, F, and G." It goes on to also say "2. CAR 3...", but I don't understand why they would list all the bits of FAR 23 if the type doesn't actually have to meet the requirements of that Part. However, it is true that my airplane shares the exact same TCDS number as the original CAR 3 airplane from which it was derived (in spite of being about as similar to it as a Cessna 206 is to a Cessna 150). So maybe that's the answer, regardless of the mention of Part 23 in the TCDS. I have to admit, it's a bit entertaining reading through the TCDS, seeing the evolution of the type. Each new version is described as "exactly like the previous, except...". Some of the exceptions are pretty broad. ![]() It does appear that generally the requirements in question (manual override, pilot indication) are met by other aircraft with automatic alternate air induction sources, or at least two of them. The guys at the shop all agreed that the Piper Navajo and Seneca both have those features to go along with their automatic alternate air (I don't know firsthand myself...I'm just taking their word for it). If there's anyone out there who actually knows something about how aircraft type certificates are granted who wants to take a look, here's the TCDS: http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/e906cc8a49ec031586256f7e0064e791/$FILE/1a13.pdf The URL looks suspiciously to me as though it may contain a session ID, and so it may not be valid by the time anyone else reads this post. But you can navigate to the sheet by going he http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory...e?OpenFrameSet and then looking up the TCDS direction (it's 1A13, just like the name of the PDF file in the previous link). Anyway, fun with type certificates... ![]() Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Hurricane relief | Dave Stadt | Piloting | 94 | September 8th 05 07:02 PM |
Hurricane relief | Gary Drescher | Instrument Flight Rules | 51 | September 8th 05 03:33 AM |
Military jet makes emergency landing at MidAmerica | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 1st 03 02:28 AM |
First Emergency (Long Post) | [email protected] | Owning | 14 | July 23rd 03 02:46 AM |