A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Non existent VOR



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 4th 06, 02:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Non existent VOR

Steven Barnes wrote:

I'm late in joining this thread, but on an Angel Flight a year or so ago, I
was happily moving along my IFR flight plan following airways when IND
approach told my the Hoosier VOR was OTS. I was never told that during my
briefing. 3 seconds after an "uhh... stand by" on my part, IND offered
vector direct to my next VOR. Duh. D - next waypoint & we're off. Actually
shaved a few minutes off, anyway.
It did kind of surprise me, though.


I've also seen (on an Angel flight, coincidentally) that I knew from NOTAMs that
a VOR was scheduled to go OTS for maintenance during my flight, and should go
out of service about the time I got to it. I was surprised to find I received
the identifier, and queried ATC - was the VOR operational or not? They had no
clue. Shortly after that the identifier stopped, and I informed ATC I would be
out of navaid range for a few minutes and requested they monitor my track, which
they agreed to do.

Curiosity question for ATCers: how do you find out about inop navaids?

Dave
  #2  
Old April 4th 06, 03:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Non existent VOR


"Dave Butler" wrote in message
news:1144158392.686044@sj-nntpcache-3...

I've also seen (on an Angel flight, coincidentally) that I knew from
NOTAMs that a VOR was scheduled to go OTS for maintenance during my
flight, and should go out of service about the time I got to it. I was
surprised to find I received the identifier, and queried ATC - was the VOR
operational or not? They had no clue. Shortly after that the identifier
stopped, and I informed ATC I would be out of navaid range for a few
minutes and requested they monitor my track, which they agreed to do.

Curiosity question for ATCers: how do you find out about inop navaids?


Requests for maintenance outages on NAVAIDs within the airspace delegated to
the facility are made by Airway Facilities. If they're approved, we show
the NAVAID OTS. If a NAVAID in an adjacent facility is OTS we're generally
notified by that facility.


  #3  
Old April 4th 06, 03:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Non existent VOR

On 04/04/06 06:37, Dave Butler wrote:
Steven Barnes wrote:

I'm late in joining this thread, but on an Angel Flight a year or so ago, I
was happily moving along my IFR flight plan following airways when IND
approach told my the Hoosier VOR was OTS. I was never told that during my
briefing. 3 seconds after an "uhh... stand by" on my part, IND offered
vector direct to my next VOR. Duh. D - next waypoint & we're off. Actually
shaved a few minutes off, anyway.
It did kind of surprise me, though.


I've also seen (on an Angel flight, coincidentally) that I knew from NOTAMs that
a VOR was scheduled to go OTS for maintenance during my flight, and should go
out of service about the time I got to it. I was surprised to find I received
the identifier, and queried ATC - was the VOR operational or not? They had no
clue. Shortly after that the identifier stopped, and I informed ATC I would be
out of navaid range for a few minutes and requested they monitor my track, which
they agreed to do.


I'm not criticizing, but am just curious: Why did you plan your flight
route such that it depended on the VOR even when it was NOTAM'd to be OTS?


Curiosity question for ATCers: how do you find out about inop navaids?

Dave



--
Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane
Cal Aggie Flying Farmers
Sacramento, CA
  #4  
Old April 4th 06, 07:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Non existent VOR

Mark Hansen wrote:

I'm not criticizing, but am just curious: Why did you plan your flight
route such that it depended on the VOR even when it was NOTAM'd to be OTS?


Because I knew I could safely navigate without the VOR. I was carrying a
handheld GPS, I planned to be in contact with ATC, the weather was severe clear,
the terrain was flat. I could easily have navigated visually or by dead
reckoning if necessary.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.