A hypothetical situation, and a doubt

Regulations require that any failure requires a landing as
soon as reasonably possible. If over the open ocean with no
place close, you still divert and land at the nearest
suitable airport. This may be your departure point, the
destination or some airport along the way.



--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


wrote in message
oups.com...
| Greg Farris wrote:
|
| done by the book. In a 747 you should hardly notice any
performance loss.
|
| GF
|
| I know it isn't what you're saying but if you lose one
engine in a
| 4-engine craft, you don't return but carry on, surely?!
|
| Ramapriya
|

Regulations require that any failure requires a landing as
soon as reasonably possible.


Better quote a cite on that one Jim, and surely not ANY failure.

By the way, the 747 is CERTIFIED to fly on 3 and the British Airways ops
manual allows it. In this case, it was an oil pressure problem, and they
did a precautionary shut down.

Even the Minimum Equipt List says "Thou shalt not launch with (device of
choice here)... inoperative"

Al




"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:_PPZf.159$8q.140@dukeread08...
If over the open ocean with no
place close, you still divert and land at the nearest
suitable airport. This may be your departure point, the
destination or some airport along the way.



--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


wrote in message
oups.com...
| Greg Farris wrote:
|
| done by the book. In a 747 you should hardly notice any
performance loss.
|
| GF
|
| I know it isn't what you're saying but if you lose one
engine in a
| 4-engine craft, you don't return but carry on, surely?!
|
| Ramapriya
|

Al wrote

Regulations require that any failure requires a landing as
soon as reasonably possible.


Better quote a cite on that one Jim, and surely not ANY failure.

Section 121.565: Engine inoperative: Landing; reporting.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, whenever an engine
of an airplane fails or whenever the rotation of an engine is stopped to
prevent possible damage, the pilot in command shall land the airplane at
the nearest suitable airport, in point of time, at which a safe landing can
be made.

(b) If not more than one engine of an airplane that has three or more
engines fails or its rotation is stopped, the pilot in command may proceed
to an airport that he selects if, after considering the following, he
decides that proceeding to that airport is as safe as landing at the
nearest suitable airport:

Bob Moore