![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Typhoon502" wrote: John Carrier wrote: Tomcats couldn't even shoot AIM-120. That's a misleading statement. There is no inherent reason that F-14's could not carry and shoot AIM-120. It's just that the Navy decided it wasn't worth it. The F-14 has a long range missile. Why spend money integrating a new missile on an airframe that's going to go out of service soon? The changes that would be needed were largely software and flight test. Yep. Chump change and the aircraft could have had a vastly superior weapon than Sparrow for a decade. Also better than Phoenix out to AAMRAM's max range as well. In hindsight it didn't matter ... largely because the aircraft was underutilized in Desert Storm, its last opportunity to fight the good fight. Maybe the changes were small in scale, but if the service is unwilling to do the integration, then that still means the F-14 was wholly incapable of using the DOD's best AAM; the fact that the Navy didn't incorporate AMRAAM while they were doing the Bombcat work is what's surprising. I read once a discussion or article about the F-14 and the Super Hornet and how Grumman kept coming back to the Pentagon with modernized Tomcats, and kept getting shown the door. At what point did the Pentagon (or the Navy specifically...it's been a while since I recalled the particulars) really decide that they didn't want the Tomcats around? Was it cost & complexity that turned them against the F-14 in favor of the Super Bug? Once the F/A-18 demonstrated it's avionics reliability in a production configuration, the F-14 was doomed. I do have some insight into this as I worked both the F-18's APG-65 radar and the F-14's APG-71 radar (on the D). I also participated in several Tomcat upgrade proposals from the radar side, so I'm pretty familiar with both sides of the arguement. The F-14D was a great preforming aircraft, but even after the radar upgrade it was still a maintenance hog on other systems, about 4X per flight hour greater than the F/A-18. -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|