A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GPS altitude vs altimeter altitude



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 17th 06, 04:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GPS altitude vs altimeter altitude


"BTIZ" wrote

I do hope this UAV flight has been cleared with the local aviation
authorities, or is contained within a "restricted" airspace to keep other
VFR and IFR aircraft safe.


I've got to agree with this one.

To the OP: When an RC airplane leaves your sight line, it is now a UAV, and
under another set of rules.

This is a rather hot topic, and in the news, as of late. Don't be the one
that gets used as an example. It could cost you a bunch of money, jail
time, or a lifetime of regret. (over the people that your plane killed)

Most likely, nothing bad would happen. Is that something you want to
gamble your like on? Is it worth it?
--
Jim in NC

  #2  
Old April 17th 06, 06:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GPS altitude vs altimeter altitude

Morgans wrote:

Most likely, nothing bad would happen. Is that something you want to
gamble your like on? Is it worth it?



I'm guessing that you either live east of the Mississippi or on/near the
west coast, and not in Oklahoma. RC airplanes can and have killed
people. However, generally this happens from a much larger plane than I
plan on using, and the chances of someone getting injured is reduced
significantly when the engine isn't running. With this in mind these
are the situations I foresee potential for serious injury. The only way
I see this coming in contact with someone on the ground is if the engine
is not running. Therefore, the biggest danger to someone or something
on the ground is gone. So for the plane to impact a person while the
engine was running it would have to be an impact with a real plane. If
the difference in heading of the real plane and the model were between
greater than 0 and less than 90, then the prop wold be history before it
penetrated the cabin and would the now dead engine would loose most of
it's energy before in impacted someone in the plane, most of the rest of
the plane would never enter the cabin. If the difference between the
heading of the real plane and the model were between 90 and 180, that's
big a problem. I'm not sure how feasible it would be to have some kind
of sensor to detect such an impending collision and do something about
it. Other than avoiding busy airspace, I'm not sure what to do about
it. Keep in mind that the class C around KOKC which is with in 3 miles
of my house and I plan on staying away from, really isn't very busy at
all. There is still the possibility that something goes wrong with the
autopilot and sends the plane down the wrong side of the highway at 3
feet off the ground. To virtually eliminate this type of situation, I
plan on having a completely independent system that will kill the engine
and put the plane in a slow flight configuration should the altitude
drop below a given amount. Granted that could also fail but the chances
of both the autopilot and that system failing is very remote, that "fail
safe" system would be pretty small and light and could be made redundant
and possibly include a the deployment of a parachute. All this said I
am open to other ideas to make it safer.

--
Chris W
KE5GIX

Gift Giving Made Easy
Get the gifts you want &
give the gifts they want
One stop wish list for any gift,
from anywhere, for any occasion!
http://thewishzone.com
  #3  
Old April 17th 06, 06:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GPS altitude vs altimeter altitude

Chris W wrote:
There is still the possibility that something goes wrong with the
autopilot and sends the plane down the wrong side of the highway at 3
feet off the ground. To virtually eliminate this type of situation, I
plan on having a completely independent system that will kill the engine
and put the plane in a slow flight configuration should the altitude
drop below a given amount. Granted that could also fail but the chances
of both the autopilot and that system failing is very remote, that "fail
safe" system would be pretty small and light and could be made redundant
and possibly include a the deployment of a parachute. All this said I
am open to other ideas to make it safer.


What is the purpose of the project? Why couldn't it be done in a way
where the model remains within sight at all times - say by flying a
pre-established figure-8 course or something similar, and having a
manual override capability if it's observed to stray from the planned
course? Your current plan certainly appears to violate the model
airplane safety guidelines which state that "10. The operator of a
radio-controlled model aircraft
shall control it during the entire flight, maintaining visual contact
without enhancement
other than by corrective lenses that are prescribed for the pilot. No
model aircraft shall be
equipped with devices which allow it to be flown to a selected location
which is beyond
the visual range of the pilot."
http://www.modelaircraft.org/PDF-files/105.PDF

  #4  
Old April 17th 06, 11:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GPS altitude vs altimeter altitude

On 16 Apr 2006 22:42:05 -0700, "peter" wrote:

"10. The operator of a
radio-controlled model aircraft
shall control it during the entire flight, maintaining visual contact
without enhancement
other than by corrective lenses that are prescribed for the pilot. No
model aircraft shall be
equipped with devices which allow it to be flown to a selected location
which is beyond
the visual range of the pilot."


What about the guys who flew the RC plane to Ireland?

(Gotta love that bit about corrective lenses!... "My glasses! Where
did I put my glasses?")



-- all the best, Dan Ford

email: usenet AT danford DOT net

Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com
In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com
  #5  
Old April 17th 06, 11:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GPS altitude vs altimeter altitude

It wasn't radio controlled, but a robot. It was also out of
US airspace over the ocean and well below any Atlantic
aircraft traffic and above the ships. It may have had a
chase airplane until it was off-shore and it may have been
met at the other end. It wasn't a secret, they had to have
all the paperwork in order to get the record.

Maybe the guy is wanting to build a cheap cruise missile?



--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Cub Driver" usenet AT danford DOT net wrote in message
...
| On 16 Apr 2006 22:42:05 -0700, "peter"
wrote:
|
| "10. The operator of a
| radio-controlled model aircraft
| shall control it during the entire flight, maintaining
visual contact
| without enhancement
| other than by corrective lenses that are prescribed for
the pilot. No
| model aircraft shall be
| equipped with devices which allow it to be flown to a
selected location
| which is beyond
| the visual range of the pilot."
|
| What about the guys who flew the RC plane to Ireland?
|
| (Gotta love that bit about corrective lenses!... "My
glasses! Where
| did I put my glasses?")
|
|
|
| -- all the best, Dan Ford
|
| email: usenet AT danford DOT net
|
| Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com
| Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com
| In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com


  #6  
Old April 17th 06, 07:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GPS altitude vs altimeter altitude

I lived in Tulsa and OKC and have now been in Kansas over 25
years. Your proposed altitudes are above the MEA on
airways. Done properly, with reserved airspace [you can get
approval to use the MOAs] what you want to do is safe. But
if you just want to launch and depend on luck to avoid
killing somebody you're being reckless.
A quick Google returned this...
Drone aircraft may prowl US skies | CNET News.com Drone
aircraft may prowl US skies | Can unmanned aerial vehicles
doing ... the FAA says it's created a UAV "program office"
to come up with new rules of the ...
news.com.com/Drone+aircraft+may+prowl+U.
S.+skies/2100-11746_3-6055658.html - 54k - Cached - Similar
pages


Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and the National Airspace
System This process has aided the FAA, other government
agencies, and the UAV manufacturers ... except for those
flown under the AMA Experimental Aircraft Rules; ...
www.house.gov/transportation/
aviation/03-29-06/03-29-06memo.html - 16k - Cached - Similar
pages


AOPA Online - Regulatory Brief -- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Unmanned aircraft (UA) operate without an on-board pilot or
crew. ... The FAA is in the process of drafting rules that
establish regulatory guidance for UAS ...
www.aopa.org/whatsnew/regulatory/unmanned.html - 29k -
Cached - Similar pages


Use of Pilotless Planes May Be on the Rise Last year, the
FAA allowed two unmanned aircraft to be tested for
commercial use. ... The Fine Print: WPNI Rules for Posting
Content | Privacy Policy ...
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/
content/article/2006/03/29/AR2006032901814.html - Similar
pages


Federal Aviation Administration - Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
(UAVs) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) – sometimes called
“unmanned aircraft systems,” ... The FAA’s main concern
about UAV operations in civil airspace is safety. ...
www.faa.gov/news/news_story.cfm?type=fact_
sheet&year=2005&date=092005 - 8k - Cached - Similar pages


Section 5. Potential Flight Hazards 7-5-1. Accident Cause
Factors ... However, some time may pass before the FAA is
notified of these outages, ... 7-5-5. Unmanned Aircraft. a.
Unmanned aircraft (UA), commonly referred to as ...
www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIM/Chap7/aim0705.html - 57k -
Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from www.faa.gov ]




I see on your website that your name is Woodhouse and you
sell wishes. Does your planned UAV that will fly up to
6,000 feet for many miles [you said you early test would be
20 miles] make up a "wish" for a customer?
Since you're in OKC, why not visit the Feds and learn what
is legal and how to do it safely?

--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.



"Chris W" wrote in message
news:TpF0g.942$9c6.755@dukeread11...
| Morgans wrote:
|
| Most likely, nothing bad would happen. Is that
something you want to
| gamble your like on? Is it worth it?
|
|
| I'm guessing that you either live east of the Mississippi
or on/near the
| west coast, and not in Oklahoma. RC airplanes can and
have killed
| people. However, generally this happens from a much
larger plane than I
| plan on using, and the chances of someone getting injured
is reduced
| significantly when the engine isn't running. With this in
mind these
| are the situations I foresee potential for serious injury.
The only way
| I see this coming in contact with someone on the ground is
if the engine
| is not running. Therefore, the biggest danger to someone
or something
| on the ground is gone. So for the plane to impact a
person while the
| engine was running it would have to be an impact with a
real plane. If
| the difference in heading of the real plane and the model
were between
| greater than 0 and less than 90, then the prop wold be
history before it
| penetrated the cabin and would the now dead engine would
loose most of
| it's energy before in impacted someone in the plane, most
of the rest of
| the plane would never enter the cabin. If the difference
between the
| heading of the real plane and the model were between 90
and 180, that's
| big a problem. I'm not sure how feasible it would be to
have some kind
| of sensor to detect such an impending collision and do
something about
| it. Other than avoiding busy airspace, I'm not sure what
to do about
| it. Keep in mind that the class C around KOKC which is
with in 3 miles
| of my house and I plan on staying away from, really isn't
very busy at
| all. There is still the possibility that something goes
wrong with the
| autopilot and sends the plane down the wrong side of the
highway at 3
| feet off the ground. To virtually eliminate this type of
situation, I
| plan on having a completely independent system that will
kill the engine
| and put the plane in a slow flight configuration should
the altitude
| drop below a given amount. Granted that could also fail
but the chances
| of both the autopilot and that system failing is very
remote, that "fail
| safe" system would be pretty small and light and could be
made redundant
| and possibly include a the deployment of a parachute. All
this said I
| am open to other ideas to make it safer.
|
| --
| Chris W
| KE5GIX
|
| Gift Giving Made Easy
| Get the gifts you want &
| give the gifts they want
| One stop wish list for any gift,
| from anywhere, for any occasion!
| http://thewishzone.com


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
Pressure Altitude and Terminology Icebound Piloting 0 November 27th 04 09:14 PM
What's minimum safe O2 level? PaulH Piloting 29 November 9th 04 07:35 PM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Instrument Flight Rules 42 October 5th 03 12:39 AM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Piloting 38 October 5th 03 12:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.