![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote in
om: Technically, I don't think you are allowed to fly sport pilot if you know you have a condition that would disqualify you from having a third class medical. My understanding is that you can't fly if you have a condition which prevents you from flying safely - this is not the same as having a condition which would nix a class III. Jose That understanding is incorrect... the part of the fars that mention medical exams, and certain medical conditions SPECIFIALCALLY exclude glider and sport pilots. If you need it, I can quote it just no time to dig it up at the moment. -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My understanding is that you can't fly if you have a condition which
prevents you from flying safely - this is not the same as having a condition which would nix a class III. That understanding is incorrect... the part of the fars that mention medical exams, and certain medical conditions SPECIFIALCALLY exclude glider and sport pilots. I don't see how that contradicts. Even though a SP is excluded from having to meet specific medical requirements, they are not excluded from having to meet =any= requriements. They are still prohibited from flying when they are unfit to fly, as determined by the pilot himself or herself. The pilot can have a condition which would nix a class III, but still be safe to fly. This is why I disagree with: Technically, I don't think you are allowed to fly sport pilot if you know you have a condition that would disqualify you from having a third class medical. Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote in
t: My understanding is that you can't fly if you have a condition which prevents you from flying safely - this is not the same as having a condition which would nix a class III. That understanding is incorrect... the part of the fars that mention medical exams, and certain medical conditions SPECIFIALCALLY exclude glider and sport pilots. I don't see how that contradicts. Even though a SP is excluded from having to meet specific medical requirements, they are not excluded from having to meet =any= requriements. They are still prohibited from flying when they are unfit to fly, as determined by the pilot himself or herself. The pilot can have a condition which would nix a class III, but still be safe to fly. This is why I disagree with: Jose Yup, your right, re-reading your first post, you were agreeing with me.... red face... -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:30:54 GMT, "Dick" wrote:
What has anyone actually experienced in making the change from a third class medical to the Sport Pilots "driver" license? My insurance company has said "no problem unless the policy specifically states a third class medical is needed" (it doesn't). I've decided to do this when my current medical expires in December. The insurance representative told me not to worry about the fact that there's no check box on the application: "You're still a private pilot, but you'll be flying under Sport Pilot rules." Just to be on the safe side, I will write beside it that I am using Sport Pilot privileges. -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:45:49 GMT, ET wrote:
Other than checking with your insurance company, there is no "transition" to make.... The last valid day of your medical you are a private pilot, the next day you may fly using Sport Pilot Privileges... (and limitations). When this first applied, there was a squib in AOPA Pilot about a guy in California who has a Special Issuance medical. It's good for one year, and the tests he submits are processed and the medical issued by the FAA in six months. He's not allowed to submit the paperback until four months before he wants to renew, so every year there's two months he can't fly. (I am quoting these times from memory; they may be off.) So this year he flew his Piper Cub on Sport Pilot privileges during the two-month hiatus, firing up his AT-6 Texan only after the medical came through from the FAA. -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:37:00 -0700, "BTIZ"
wrote: no here lies another question... if you "were" a PP, and now flying under SP, you were at one time qualified to fly into airports that are now limited.. and the other SP restrictions.. can you still do that without the SP log book endorsements needed by an SP? I think the answer is yes, but it might be worthwhile getting a specific endorsement for controlled airspace. (I assume that private pilots don't get a specific sign-off for ATC? If they do, then that sign-off ought to carry over to their life as a Sport Pilot.) -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver usenet AT danford DOT net wrote in
: On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:37:00 -0700, "BTIZ" wrote: no here lies another question... if you "were" a PP, and now flying under SP, you were at one time qualified to fly into airports that are now limited.. and the other SP restrictions.. can you still do that without the SP log book endorsements needed by an SP? I think the answer is yes, but it might be worthwhile getting a specific endorsement for controlled airspace. (I assume that private pilots don't get a specific sign-off for ATC? If they do, then that sign-off ought to carry over to their life as a Sport Pilot.) -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com Not needed, the regs specifically address this issue. it says, in effect, a private pilot acting under sport pilot has already had the airspace training needed, therefore does not require the endorsement (you really already have the logged instruction time in your logbook as a student) -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Class C Airspace Discussion | Mike Granby | Piloting | 48 | April 18th 06 12:25 AM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Sport pilot question | [email protected] | Home Built | 27 | May 30th 05 08:09 PM |
Can a Private Pilot tow gliders and get paid? | BTIZ | Soaring | 1 | October 17th 04 01:35 AM |