A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Accuracy of GPS in Garmin 430/530



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 26th 06, 05:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Accuracy of GPS in Garmin 430/530

I have managed at least three teams commercially on four projects in the
last 10 years, and at least two of those projects had over 200K lines of
code. So I guess that would be a yes.


Bug free?

First, the pilot shouldn't be using the handheld in IMC unless...


True. But pilots will do things they shouldn't do, and the equipment
maker gets sued, whether they helped cause the crash or not. This is
expensive even if they win.

Your position appears to be


It's not my position. I am proposing reasons why it isn't done.
Whether is =should= be done is another question, but I can easily see
why they don't do it.

By that logic, we should just stop all technological development,
because God forbid that someone innovates and makes something that is
actually precise, useful, and more advanced than what is already in the
cockpit?


This is the logic behind a lot of aircraft design. I am not a lawyer,
but I vaguely recall a case against (I think) Cessna which came down to
"this design is bad and caused the crash. You knew it was bad because
twenty years later you improved it". I don't know if Cessna won or
lost, but the idea had traction.

In any case, if someone deliberately takes an uncertified instrument and
uses it as a primary instrument in IFR, they are violating the rules and I
guess they are responsible for their own bad behavior.


Well, the pilot does an SPT and kills somebody on the ground, who sues
the pilot, the plane maker, the GPS maker, the airport where the plane
took off from, and the stars in the sky. It comes down to who has more
money from which to collect. If the pilot and his insurance is
significantly less than the GPS maker and his insurance, then any sane
lawyer will go after the GPS maker. The argument that the GPS maker
enticed the pilot to use this device in IMC will likely gain traction
against a judge and/or jury of non-pilots who see many other cases of
enticement for profit.

It =is= the pilot's fault. But the victim is dead and the GPS maker has
more money. I wouldn't blame the GPS maker for being gun-shy about
putting in a feature of less than dubious value in the face of this.

I wish it were different.

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Garmin backing away from additional GDL-69 features for 430/530 products? Andrew Gideon Owning 2 September 9th 05 11:36 PM
Inexpensive Garmin 430/530 question vlado Owning 2 May 19th 05 03:21 AM
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) Jon Woellhaf Piloting 12 September 4th 04 11:55 PM
WAAS and Garmin 430/530 DoodyButch Owning 23 October 13th 03 04:06 AM
Garmin 430/530 Questions Steve Coleman Instrument Flight Rules 16 August 28th 03 09:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.