![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Tomblin wrote:
Any suggestions how to reassure her? Upgrade to a mode-S transponder and then display the TIS information on your moving map. The entire NY State Thruway corridor, including your home airport, is covered by the TIS network. -- Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter R." wrote:
Paul Tomblin wrote: Any suggestions how to reassure her? Upgrade to a mode-S transponder and then display the TIS information on your moving map. The entire NY State Thruway corridor, including your home airport, is covered by the TIS network. That assumes that this system will be around a while. Seems like it or something like it is not long for this world so buying equipment to use it may not be worth it. Ron Lee |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Lee wrote:
That assumes that this system will be around a while. Seems like it or something like it is not long for this world so buying equipment to use it may not be worth it. The authors of _Aviation Consumer_ seem to disagree but no matter; I don't really expect Paul to take my suggestion seriously anyway. -- Peter |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Peter R." said:
Ron Lee wrote: That assumes that this system will be around a while. Seems like it or something like it is not long for this world so buying equipment to use it may not be worth it. The authors of _Aviation Consumer_ seem to disagree but no matter; I don't really expect Paul to take my suggestion seriously anyway. Not in a club plane, anyway. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed... ..... Oh, wait a minute, he already does." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 02 May 2006 08:17:26 -0400, Peter R. wrote:
Ron Lee wrote: That assumes that this system will be around a while. Seems like it or something like it is not long for this world so buying equipment to use it may not be worth it. The authors of _Aviation Consumer_ seem to disagree but no matter; I don't really expect Paul to take my suggestion seriously anyway. Where did AC write that TIS will be around for a while? It seems like the Next Big Thing for traffic is ADS-B. We're bouncing this around for our club aircraft now. TIS has wider coverage today, but we're concerned about its longevity. If we'd a failed transponder, the incremental cost for a mode S transponder would be small enough that we'd do it. But to throw out a perfectly good mode C transponder for something that will be replaced in a relatively short time seems inefficient. - Andrew |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Gideon wrote:
Where did AC write that TIS will be around for a while? It seems like the Next Big Thing for traffic is ADS-B. The article was titled, "Airborne Traffic Alerting: TIS Still the One to Beat," and a sidebar titled, "Why TIS is Still a Good Bet." These articles were in the November 2005 (volume 35, Number 11) issue of _Aviation Consumer_. Send me a working email address for a return gift in the form of some random words that, if viewed under certain lighting conditions, approximately resemble these articles, if you are interested. pjricc @ gmail . com -- Peter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 31 May 2006 15:31:36 -0400, Peter R. wrote:
The article was titled, "Airborne Traffic Alerting: TIS Still the One to Beat," and a sidebar titled, "Why TIS is Still a Good Bet." These articles were in the November 2005 (volume 35, Number 11) issue of _Aviation Consumer_. Thanks. I found it: http://www.aviationconsumer.com/issu...rt/5496-1.html First, this mentions that ADS-B is far from deployment. But that's not quite true, at least around here. We're located in northern NJ, which is right at the northernmost tip of ADS-B deployment on the East Coast. So we'd see *some* benefit from ADS-B pretty quickly. However, there are other interesting points. There's a paragraph which suggests, for example, that some TIS units will be "field upgradable" to "be useable in the ADS-B traffic world". What might that mean? The sidebar at: http://www.aviationconsumer.com/news.../35-11-Why.pdf discusses my concern regarding TIS: that it is a short-term solution to be replaced by ADS-B. However, a check of: http://www.aviationconsumer.com/news.../35-8-Mode.pdf shows that none of the 23 airports to lose TIS in the short term are in my immediate neighborhood (though some are w/in just a few hours flight). Hmm. - Andrew |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Gideon wrote:
snip discusses my concern regarding TIS: that it is a short-term solution to be replaced by ADS-B. However, a check of: http://www.aviationconsumer.com/news.../35-8-Mode.pdf shows that none of the 23 airports to lose TIS in the short term are in my immediate neighborhood (though some are w/in just a few hours flight). Hmm. As someone who flies a lot in the Northeast and mid-Atlantic US, I am very happy with what TIS is currently providing me. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |