A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 4th 06, 12:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training

BTIZ wrote:


It's not dangerous... if that is how you are trained.. that is all you know.
Lets just think about all those military pilots that the first aircraft they
ever flew was a twin JET, T-37.


Are you sure the T37 was a first airplane?

I had a retired Air Force school teacher that trained in T37's in the
70's, but I seem to remember him flying something before it, maybe a T34?
  #12  
Old May 4th 06, 01:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training

... limited to asymmetric thrust singles.

That's all singles..."Right Rudder!!!"

  #13  
Old May 4th 06, 01:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training

Sure you can. I trained a woman in a Beech Baron from zero time to her
PPL back in the 60's. Her husband had chartered me a couple times and
one day asked if I could teach his wife to fly the Baron. I told him
probably if she had a normal aptitude. So, he bought her one as a
surprise birthday present and hired me to train her. She did fine and
he still chartered me from time to time...in her airplane of course!!!
I trained a number of Japanese pilots in Piper Aztecs in the late 60's
and they were all very low time or zero when they started. Not a big
deal if you can afford it.

  #14  
Old May 4th 06, 03:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training

Same thing happens if he goes the SE route.. he can't be PIC in a twin without another check ride. So what's your point?

Just that you'd think someone who got their PPL in a twin wouldn't need
a checkride to have SE PIC privileges. Obviously there's more involved
in learning to fly a twin so that you'd think the SE authorization
would be automatic.

  #15  
Old May 4th 06, 03:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training

... limited to asymmetric thrust singles.

That's all singles..."Right Rudder!!!"


Asymmetric thrust is a multi engine term, are you referring to the left
turning tendency in singles?

  #16  
Old May 4th 06, 05:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training

It was a joke.

  #17  
Old May 4th 06, 06:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training

It was a joke.

I realize that. I should've directed my question to Jose.

  #18  
Old May 4th 06, 08:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training

I realize that. I should've directed my question to Jose.

It was a joke. Yes, with one engine out in a twin, you have a single
engine plane, and that engine is likely to be off the centerline. So in
keeping with the "limited to centerline thrust" rating you can get in
the eggbeater, a multi-only rating would allow you to fly single engine
airplanes only if the thrust were off the centerline.

Yes, I know you can have two engines out in a trimotor and have
centerline thrust - we can overanalyze it.

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #19  
Old May 5th 06, 03:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training

Barry... some of them in the 70s and early 80s may have done through "Hondo"
and it was in C-182s.. just to get up to solo.. I do not remember if they
had to solo or not.

Some of the older pilots.. before the advent of Jet trainers may have seen
the T-34.

The Navy was using the T-34C a few years ago, I'm not sure if they still
are.

Currently new AF Pilot "Trainees" get their FAA Pvt Pilot certificate while
a 2Lt, paid for at local flight schools by Uncle before reporting to AF
Pilot Training. If they cannot complete in set calendar time or flight time,
they do not get to go to AF Pilot. That program will phase out soon as the
AF goes back to a "Hondo" like program. Civil contract instructors. "Hondo"
refers to the town and airfield west of San Antonio Texas that provided the
training (filter service) to pilot candidates.

BT


"B A R R Y" wrote in message
t...
BTIZ wrote:


It's not dangerous... if that is how you are trained.. that is all you
know.
Lets just think about all those military pilots that the first aircraft
they ever flew was a twin JET, T-37.


Are you sure the T37 was a first airplane?

I had a retired Air Force school teacher that trained in T37's in the
70's, but I seem to remember him flying something before it, maybe a T34?



  #20  
Old May 5th 06, 03:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi engine plane for PPL or Pilot Training

"Kingfish" wrote in message
oups.com...
Same thing happens if he goes the SE route.. he can't be PIC in a twin
without another check ride. So what's your point?


Just that you'd think someone who got their PPL in a twin wouldn't need
a checkride to have SE PIC privileges. Obviously there's more involved
in learning to fly a twin so that you'd think the SE authorization
would be automatic.


So one would think.. but that guy getting training in a twin has different
engine out procedures than the SE guy. Hate to have the engine start
coughing and the first thing he does is "cage" a perfectly good engine with
no "second" engine to carry him home. Also some "Twins" don't have to worry
about things like P-factor
BT


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Student Drop-Out Rates...why? Jay Honeck Piloting 254 September 1st 05 12:00 AM
Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? Blueskies Piloting 14 July 12th 05 05:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.