![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTIZ wrote:
It's not dangerous... if that is how you are trained.. that is all you know. Lets just think about all those military pilots that the first aircraft they ever flew was a twin JET, T-37. Are you sure the T37 was a first airplane? I had a retired Air Force school teacher that trained in T37's in the 70's, but I seem to remember him flying something before it, maybe a T34? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
... limited to asymmetric thrust singles.
That's all singles..."Right Rudder!!!" |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sure you can. I trained a woman in a Beech Baron from zero time to her
PPL back in the 60's. Her husband had chartered me a couple times and one day asked if I could teach his wife to fly the Baron. I told him probably if she had a normal aptitude. So, he bought her one as a surprise birthday present and hired me to train her. She did fine and he still chartered me from time to time...in her airplane of course!!! I trained a number of Japanese pilots in Piper Aztecs in the late 60's and they were all very low time or zero when they started. Not a big deal if you can afford it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Same thing happens if he goes the SE route.. he can't be PIC in a twin without another check ride. So what's your point?
Just that you'd think someone who got their PPL in a twin wouldn't need a checkride to have SE PIC privileges. Obviously there's more involved in learning to fly a twin so that you'd think the SE authorization would be automatic. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
... limited to asymmetric thrust singles.
That's all singles..."Right Rudder!!!" Asymmetric thrust is a multi engine term, are you referring to the left turning tendency in singles? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was a joke.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was a joke.
I realize that. I should've directed my question to Jose. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I realize that. I should've directed my question to Jose.
It was a joke. Yes, with one engine out in a twin, you have a single engine plane, and that engine is likely to be off the centerline. So in keeping with the "limited to centerline thrust" rating you can get in the eggbeater, a multi-only rating would allow you to fly single engine airplanes only if the thrust were off the centerline. Yes, I know you can have two engines out in a trimotor and have centerline thrust - we can overanalyze it. ![]() Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barry... some of them in the 70s and early 80s may have done through "Hondo"
and it was in C-182s.. just to get up to solo.. I do not remember if they had to solo or not. Some of the older pilots.. before the advent of Jet trainers may have seen the T-34. The Navy was using the T-34C a few years ago, I'm not sure if they still are. Currently new AF Pilot "Trainees" get their FAA Pvt Pilot certificate while a 2Lt, paid for at local flight schools by Uncle before reporting to AF Pilot Training. If they cannot complete in set calendar time or flight time, they do not get to go to AF Pilot. That program will phase out soon as the AF goes back to a "Hondo" like program. Civil contract instructors. "Hondo" refers to the town and airfield west of San Antonio Texas that provided the training (filter service) to pilot candidates. BT "B A R R Y" wrote in message t... BTIZ wrote: It's not dangerous... if that is how you are trained.. that is all you know. Lets just think about all those military pilots that the first aircraft they ever flew was a twin JET, T-37. Are you sure the T37 was a first airplane? I had a retired Air Force school teacher that trained in T37's in the 70's, but I seem to remember him flying something before it, maybe a T34? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kingfish" wrote in message
oups.com... Same thing happens if he goes the SE route.. he can't be PIC in a twin without another check ride. So what's your point? Just that you'd think someone who got their PPL in a twin wouldn't need a checkride to have SE PIC privileges. Obviously there's more involved in learning to fly a twin so that you'd think the SE authorization would be automatic. So one would think.. but that guy getting training in a twin has different engine out procedures than the SE guy. Hate to have the engine start coughing and the first thing he does is "cage" a perfectly good engine with no "second" engine to carry him home. Also some "Twins" don't have to worry about things like P-factor BT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Student Drop-Out Rates...why? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 254 | September 1st 05 12:00 AM |
Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? | Blueskies | Piloting | 14 | July 12th 05 05:45 AM |