![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was back in the days of the F-4 and I saw the smoky exhaust trail before I spotted
the airplane, so it must have been Air Force. Coulda been Navy(?) The USAF didn't own the only smoke-emitting Phantoms. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 May 2006 09:09:51 -0700, "Kingfish" wrote
in .com:: Coulda been Navy(?) The USAF didn't own the only smoke-emitting Phantoms. Yep. A Navy A-4 even hit a glider in 1986: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Notice how the NTSB failed to find the military pilot to have contributed to the cause of this civil/military MAC despite his violation of § 91.113(d(2): A glider has the right-of-way over an airship, powered parachute, weight-shift-control aircraft, airplane, or rotorcraft:: NTSB Identification: LAX86MA186A. The docket is stored on NTSB microfiche number 31421. Accident occurred Sunday, April 20, 1986 at WARNER SPRINGS, CA Aircraft:LTV AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES A7E, registration: USN Injuries: 2 Uninjured. A ROLLADEN-SCHNEIDER LS-4 GLIDER AND AN LTV A7E JET COLLIDED OVER HOT SPRINGS MTN, NEAR WARNER SPRINGS, CA. THE A7E WAS ATTEMPTING A RAPID PULL UP AND THE GLIDER WAS ATTEMPTING A NOSE DOWN, 30 DEG RIGHT TURN WHEN THEY COLLIDED. BOTH AIRCRAFT WERE OPERATING UNDER VISUAL FLT RULES AND LANDED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. NEITHER PILOT WAS INJURED. THE GLIDER LEFT WING OUTBD 3 FT SECTION WAS SEVERED. THE A7E NOSE COWLING WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED AND THE ENGINE INGESTED EXTENSIVE FIBERGLASS MATERIAL. THE COLLISION OCCURRED AS THE A7E WAS EXECUTING A SOUTHBOUND TURN ON VR 1257 AND WAS WITHIN THE ROUTE WIDTH (4 NM); THE GLIDER WAS ATTEMPTING TO GAIN LIFT ON THE WEST SIDE OF HOT SPRINGS MTN AND WAS WITHIN VR 1257 ROUTE STRUCTURE. THE A7E PLT HAD INFORMED THE NECESSARY FLT SERV STATIONS THAT THE ROUTE WAS ACTIVE; THE GLIDER PLT HAD NOT CONTACTED THE FLT SERV STATIONS TO DETERMINE IF THE ROUTE WAS ACTIVE. The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows. PREFLIGHT PLANNING/PREPARATION..IMPROPER..PILOT OF OTHER AIRCRAFT IN-FLIGHT PLANNING/DECISION..IMPROPER..PILOT OF OTHER AIRCRAFT CHECKLIST..POOR..PILOT OF OTHER AIRCRAFT Contributing Factors TERRAIN CONDITION..MOUNTAINOUS/HILLY ---------- NTSB Identification: LAX86MA186B. The docket is stored on NTSB microfiche number 31421. Accident occurred Sunday, April 20, 1986 at WARNER SPRINGS, CA Aircraft:ROLADEN-SCHNIDEN LS-4, registration: N50EH Injuries: 2 Uninjured. A ROLLADEN-SCHNEIDER LS-4 GLIDER AND AN LTV A7E JET COLLIDED OVER HOT SPRINGS MTN, NEAR WARNER SPRINGS, CA. THE A7E WAS ATTEMPTING A RAPID PULL UP AND THE GLIDER WAS ATTEMPTING A NOSE DOWN, 30 DEG RIGHT TURN WHEN THEY COLLIDED. BOTH AIRCRAFT WERE OPERATING UNDER VISUAL FLT RULES AND LANDED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. NEITHER PILOT WAS INJURED. THE GLIDER LEFT WING OUTBD 3 FT SECTION WAS SEVERED. THE A7E NOSE COWLING WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED AND THE ENGINE INGESTED EXTENSIVE FIBERGLASS MATERIAL. THE COLLISION OCCURRED AS THE A7E WAS EXECUTING A SOUTHBOUND TURN ON VR 1257 AND WAS WITHIN THE ROUTE WIDTH (4NM); THE GLIDER WAS ATTEMPTING TO GAIN LIFT ON THE WEST SIDE OF HOT SPRINGS MTN AND WAS WITHIN VR 1257 ROUTE STRUCTURE. THE A7E PLT HAD INFORMED THE NECESSARY FLT SERV STATIONS THAT THE ROUTE WAS ACTIVE; THE GLIDER PLT HAD NOT CONTACTED THE FLT SERV STATIONS TO DETERMINE IF THE ROUTE WAS ACTIVE. The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows. PREFLIGHT PLANNING/PREPARATION..IMPROPER..PILOT IN COMMAND IN-FLIGHT PLANNING/DECISION..IMPROPER..PILOT IN COMMAND CHECKLIST..POOR..PILOT IN COMMAND Contributing Factors TERRAIN CONDITION..MOUNTAINOUS/HILLY |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kingfish" wrote in message oups.com... It was back in the days of the F-4 and I saw the smoky exhaust trail before I spotted the airplane, so it must have been Air Force. Coulda been Navy(?) The USAF didn't own the only smoke-emitting Phantoms. Nope, the J-79 engines used by the USAF were notorious for smoking. It's one reason their F-4s were called Olde Smokey. During my stint with Uncle Sam's Misguided Children (USMC), we always knew one of ours from one of theirs. IIRC, it had something to do with the Navy's (and Marine's) engines coming from a different source that used some different parts... or maybe teflon somethingies. I could be wrong, of course. Care to weigh in on this Dudley? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope, the J-79 engines used by the USAF were notorious for smoking.
It's one reason their F-4s were called Olde Smokey. During my stint with Uncle Sam's Misguided Children (USMC), we always knew one of ours from one of theirs. IIRC, it had something to do with the Navy's (and Marine's) engines coming from a different source that used some different parts... or maybe teflon somethingies. Nope what? Read my post again. I said the USAF didn't own the *only* smoke-belching F-4s, the USN and USMC Phantoms also had the Pratt J79 engines that left the smoke trail IIRC. Far as I know the only F-4s that didn't smoke were the Royal Navy R-R Spey-engined planes. I too could be wrong here - where's Dudley when you need him?? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MX385 Radio removal | Marty from Florida | Owning | 3 | May 24th 13 08:26 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
1944 Aerial War Comes to Life in Radio Play | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 25th 04 10:57 PM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Cy Galley | Owning | 23 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |