![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote I have decided (for now) to avoid that area until I get my instrument rating, and can file IFR through that part.... ...where you will still have to engage the Mark I eyeball. Yeah, but the sky will not be full of VFR pilot's and it will be radar controlled. So I will not run the risk on flying there the odd day radar is not up for VFR. At least ATC will have the legal responsability to give you traffic info. I feel it's confusing that in someparts, you get loads of traffic info, other parts none, and nobody really tells you unless you really ask them. I always add "request traffic information enroute" when I initially contact ATC. That way, they will at least say "no known traffic in the area" or something on initial contact, or "no radar cover in your area" If I'm in A airspace flying IFR on a bright day, there's lesser chance of hitting another light aircraft than if I'm 50 feet below A airspace with evry other VFR plane at excactly the same altitude. I know off course that seperation in VMC while flying IFR is also the reponsability of the pilot, but A-class airspace has got to have more traffic sep from ATC than G-class, I think we can agree on that. Frode |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 6 May 2006 15:28:33 +0200, "Frode Berg"
wrote in :: I know off course that seperation in VMC while flying IFR is also the reponsability of the pilot, but A-class airspace has got to have more traffic sep from ATC than G-class, I think we can agree on that. Right. In Class A airspace ATC provides separation for all. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, and class A is prohibited for VFR.
Frode "Larry Dighera" skrev i melding ... On Sat, 6 May 2006 15:28:33 +0200, "Frode Berg" wrote in :: I know off course that seperation in VMC while flying IFR is also the reponsability of the pilot, but A-class airspace has got to have more traffic sep from ATC than G-class, I think we can agree on that. Right. In Class A airspace ATC provides separation for all. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Frode Berg" said:
Yes, and class A is prohibited for VFR. I understand there are exceptions to that rule, especially for sailplanes riding mountain waves. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody thinks of complaining." -- Jef Raskin, interviewed in Doctor Dobb's Journal |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did not know this.
On all the definitions of various air classes I've seen, all have stated "prohibited for VFR" on the class A airspace. Are you sure about this? What's the source? Frode "Paul Tomblin" skrev i melding ... In a previous article, "Frode Berg" said: Yes, and class A is prohibited for VFR. I understand there are exceptions to that rule, especially for sailplanes riding mountain waves. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody thinks of complaining." -- Jef Raskin, interviewed in Doctor Dobb's Journal |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Frode Berg" said:
I did not know this. On all the definitions of various air classes I've seen, all have stated "prohibited for VFR" on the class A airspace. Are you sure about this? What's the source? In the Canadian regulations, it says 601.06(1) No person shall operate a VFR aircraft in Class A airspace unless the aircraft is operated in accordance with an authorization issued by the Minister. (2) The Minister may issue an authorization referred to in subsection (1) where the operation of the aircraft is in the public interest and not likely to affect aviation safety. In the FARs, it says: Section 91.135: Operations in Class A airspace. Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, each person operating an aircraft in Class A airspace must conduct that operation under instrument flight rules (IFR) and in compliance with the following: (a) Clearance. Operations may be conducted only under an ATC clearance received prior to entering the airspace. (b) Communications. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each aircraft operating in Class A airspace must be equipped with a two-way radio capable of communicating with ATC on a frequency assigned by ATC. Each pilot must maintain two-way radio communications with ATC while operating in Class A airspace. (c) Transponder requirement. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft within Class A airspace unless that aircraft is equipped with the applicable equipment specified in §91.215. (d) ATC authorizations. An operator may deviate from any provision of this section under the provisions of an ATC authorization issued by the ATC facility having jurisdiction of the airspace concerned. In the case of an inoperative transponder, ATC may immediately approve an operation within a Class A airspace area allowing flight to continue, if desired, to the airport of ultimate destination, including any intermediate stops, or to proceed to a place where suitable repairs can be made, or both. Requests for deviation from any provision of this section must be submitted in writing, at least 4 days before the proposed operation. ATC may authorize a deviation on a continuing basis or for an individual flight. Note that both regulations have an "out" that allows you to operate in Class A under VFR if you have authorization. Like I said before, I've heard of these authorizations being granted to sailplanes trying to reach high altitudes on mountain waves. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "We sealed our federal pact without bloodshed and without exploitation of the weak by the strong. All it took was fairness, justice and some compromises on both sides." - George-Etienne Cartier. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Tomblin" skrev i melding ... In a previous article, "Frode Berg" said: Yes, and class A is prohibited for VFR. I understand there are exceptions to that rule, especially for sailplanes riding mountain waves. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody thinks of complaining." -- Jef Raskin, interviewed in Doctor Dobb's Journal On Sun, 7 May 2006 11:17:04 +0200, "Frode Berg" wrote in :: I did not know this. On all the definitions of various air classes I've seen, all have stated "prohibited for VFR" on the class A airspace. Are you sure about this? What's the source? Frode http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text....1.3.10.2.4.20 § 91.135 Operations in Class A airspace. top Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, each person operating an aircraft in Class A airspace must conduct that operation under instrument flight rules (IFR) and in compliance with the following: (a) Clearance. Operations may be conducted only under an ATC clearance received prior to entering the airspace. (b) Communications. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each aircraft operating in Class A airspace must be equipped with a two-way radio capable of communicating with ATC on a frequency assigned by ATC. Each pilot must maintain two-way radio communications with ATC while operating in Class A airspace. (c) Transponder requirement. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft within Class A airspace unless that aircraft is equipped with the applicable equipment specified in §91.215. (d) ATC authorizations. An operator may deviate from any provision of this section under the provisions of an ATC authorization issued by the ATC facility having jurisdiction of the airspace concerned. In the case of an inoperative transponder, ATC may immediately approve an operation within a Class A airspace area allowing flight to continue, if desired, to the airport of ultimate destination, including any intermediate stops, or to proceed to a place where suitable repairs can be made, or both. Requests for deviation from any provision of this section must be submitted in writing, at least 4 days before the proposed operation. ATC may authorize a deviation on a continuing basis or for an individual flight. [Doc. No. 24458, 56 FR 65659, Dec. 17, 1991] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frode,
What's the source? Personal experience. FL300 in a glider above Minden, NV, after coordination with ATC and opening of their "wave box". Radio contact required, too. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV | John Doe | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 19th 06 08:58 PM |
The kids are scared, was Saddam evacuated | D. Strang | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 10:36 PM |
Scared and trigger-happy | John Galt | Military Aviation | 5 | January 31st 04 12:11 AM |