![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see. My point on the other hand has nothing to do with the lack of
greeness of 100LL. My point is that the bromine in the lead scavenging agent is corrosive to the engine after the combustian event. We live with it because the high compression engine needs it to get rid of the lead. But for 1:7 compression engines this corrosive compound is an entirely unnecessary evil because the engine doesn't need the extra octane from TEL. By getting rid of TEL we get rid of bromine in the engine (lead bromide reacts with water to form hydrobromide acid). Too bad mogas is the only unleaded fuel we can get for our LC engines at this point. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("M" wrote)
Too bad mogas is the only unleaded fuel we can get for our LC engines at this point. What would your unleaded fuel of choice be? How would it be different than MoGas? Um, hydrogen? propane? 100% ethanol? Montblack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
An unleaded aviation fuel with the same quality control and tracking as
100LL would be ideal. Unfortunatley that's not going to happen anytime soon. For the time being I'll just keep doing my own alcohol test and filling up with mogas. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MB" == Montblack writes:
MB What would your unleaded fuel of choice be? Good old 80/87. But that's not coming back. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Fry" wrote in message ... "MB" == Montblack writes: MB What would your unleaded fuel of choice be? Good old 80/87. But that's not coming back. Uhhh, 80/67 had lead in it.... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uhhh, no it didn't. It was allowed a MAXIMUM of 0.5 ml / gallon of TEL, but
from the '50s on, the actual TEL count was zero in 80. Jim ".Blueskies." wrote in message . net... "Bob Fry" wrote in message ... "MB" == Montblack writes: MB What would your unleaded fuel of choice be? Good old 80/87. But that's not coming back. Uhhh, 80/67 had lead in it.... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote in message .. . Uhhh, no it didn't. It was allowed a MAXIMUM of 0.5 ml / gallon of TEL, but from the '50s on, the actual TEL count was zero in 80. Jim Thanks Jim. That's the first I had heard that...but it was not declared as no-lead fuel, so the post asking for what was the favorite unleaded fuel was a loaded question, eh? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Montblack" writes:
Too bad mogas is the only unleaded fuel we can get for our LC engines at this point. What would your unleaded fuel of choice be? #2 Diesel.... -- A host is a host from coast to & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 82 | May 19th 05 02:49 PM |
MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... | Jay Honeck | Owning | 87 | May 19th 05 02:49 PM |
Pocket PC Tips & Glide Navigator II Tips | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | December 14th 04 08:21 PM |
Mogas and microbial growth | Economic Girly Man | Owning | 6 | November 13th 04 09:14 AM |
"Dirty Tricks" and "Both Sides Do It" | Leslie Swartz | Military Aviation | 19 | March 29th 04 06:11 PM |