![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... I've often thought about some orientation aid for RC aircraft, but I think it would cost too much to make something that was accurate. You don't really need it for helis anyway, since you can fly in any direction. I guess I'm saying "bah". I don't have a clue how something like that would work. It's just a matter of learning the reflexes for the different positions. Flying backwards or sideways only adds other control requirements that aren't necessarily intuitive. There's also the added fact that all the right side up forward, backwards, and sideways stuff can be done while flying inverted which scrambles the required control inputs yet again. In the long run, I firmly believe that by the time you get some kind of electronic aid working for all of this, you would probably have worked it out in your head and be able to fly it more smoothly to boot! And we're not cheating with the heading-hold gyros! ![]() to fly an RC heli without a gyro, but it's a lot of work. Esspecially in the wind. There is an inbetween option; most hobby-grade gyros have a "rate" mode, where it simply slows rotation to sane speeds, rather than holding it in one direction. As someone who did his initial hover training without the benefit of a gyro, they were just becoming popular back in 1982 and I didn't know they existed for the first few months that I tried to learn to hover, it's a lot easier to fly the model in a modest (10 mph or so) breeze. The model wants to weather vane into the wind which becomes a natural yaw damper. The gyros we had back then were mechanical. A couple of brass fly weights attached to the output shaft of an electric motor that was mounted on a gimble with a potentiometer like those used on the control sticks of the RC transmitter. All it was, was a yaw damper and, by todays standards, not a very good one! The modern "gyro" is all solid state and all of them that have heading hold capability also have what we call a "normal" mode which behaves essentially like the old mechanical units did 20 years ago, albeit with much better precision. Those cheap coaxials look like fun. If you want something that will fly a bit more like a real heli and will do aerobatics, the T-rex is a really good little machine. All the fun of a "real" RC heli, but not quite as expensive. Generally true although you have to be careful with models like the T-Rex. They offer this model in a fully upgraded version with all the bells and whistles. It sells in the neighborhood of $500 or so, give or take a little depending on which hobby shop's advertisement you read. Then you get to buy batteries, RC flight control servos, receiver, gyro, etc. You can build and fly a "nice" IC (internal combustion) powered model for that kind of money! Even those who buy the base version of the model eventually start upgrading it as the stock plastics parts don't handle a crash as well and over time, they've got all the metal upgrades on there, only they've paid for them one at a time so now that $500 model turns out to be a $650 model. They can get you, one way or the other! RC helis will have to do for me untill I can afford lessons in a full-scale. That's one area that you and I definitely have in common! :-( Good luck & Fly Safe, Steve R. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even those who buy the base version of the model eventually start upgrading
it as the stock plastics parts don't handle a crash as well and over time Yeah, but, when you compare the price of the plastic spare parts of a T-rex, it becomes obvious why I said it's cheaper than a bigger heli. All my crashes have cost under $50 to fix. A few times I've just had to straighten the blades and put the canopy back on. The stock heli flies just fine unless you're doing hardcore 3D. The people who end up spending lots of cash on bling/upgrades are usually more committed to the hobby, or don't mind spending the $. You don't need to upgrade if you're just flying around not doing anything special. I got the a stock kit, batteries, charger, all RC gear -- everything you need to get started -- for ~$700. You can get a nitro kit for that price, sure, but you still have to spend another $150 or so on accessories if you don't already have them. And you have to keep paying for nitro. Once you get into the bigger nitro helis, it's more of a serious commitment to the hobby as you should only fly at an RC field. With the T-rex, you can just find a person-less outdoor spot, a gym, or even a hanger ![]() If you want a more serious toy, but don't really want to get into the hobby, then the T-rex is the top-of-the-line heli to get. My point is that more people here are in that mindset, rather than the guys in RC heli groups/forums (like you and me) who are obviously a bit more commited. One thing for sure, it's certinaly much easier to get started today than it was 20 years ago. Now kids, or even full-scale pilots, can get a kit up and flying without too much trouble ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MINI 500, Rinke, Turbine, Helicopter for sale, Helicopter, Revolution, Turbine Power | TurbineMini Richard | Rotorcraft | 2 | January 28th 09 07:50 PM |
Rick Stitt, Joe Rinke, Rinke Aerospace, BJ Schram, Mini 500, Turbine, Helicopter, Kit | TurbineMini Richard | Rotorcraft | 2 | January 24th 04 01:15 AM |
Mini 500, Helicycle, Turbine, Joe Rinke, Rinke Aerospace, Rick Stitt, Conversion, Kit | TurbineMini Richard | Rotorcraft | 0 | January 15th 04 11:48 PM |
TRUTH OF THE MINI-500 TURBINE CONVERSION | Dennis Chitwood | Rotorcraft | 10 | January 7th 04 05:33 PM |
Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 09:41 AM |