![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 May 2006 16:47:52 -0400, "B4RT"
wrote: Oh and FWIW; I think the water crash this thread is all about was caused because the guy came in too hot, got behind the turbine, and couldn't arrest the sink into the drink. Then the dude was so focused on getting the thing back outa the water that he did a forward version of a dynamic rollover. If he'd had a system failure, then why would he try to take off again? That sounds like a very credible explanation. Especially the characteristics of the aircraft support that (this is assuming the Mi-14 to be similar to Mi-8 in this respect). The rotor governing is probably not very good in the aircraft, in Mi-8 you are not allowed to raise the lever from idle to full power in less than 10 seconds, without a big Nr droop. As a curiosity, the russian helicopters typically do not have a Torque-meter at all. The transmission is over-engineered to take in all conditions what the engines can deliver. In Mi-8 the power is limited by the engine control system, which will limit the fuel flow and let the rotor droop if too much lever is pulled. In the final screenshots the landing gear is out. If it came out when the helicopter hit the water, they must have affected the nose-over. There was a comment in here about hin getting into low rotor RPM. That doesn't really happen in a turbine ship unless you're already behind the engine so far that you can't get the power up (or you have a low-side governor failure). Chances are the dude pulled pitch too late and saw his torque-o-meter peg at the redline and his VSI still saying "elevator-down". Looked to me like he just ran outa airspeed, altitude, and ideas all at once. Bart Mikko |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is a higher quality video.
http://www.canada.com/globaltv/natio...-9a6241666200# Click "Watch video of the crash" It show the take off, the brief hover and the sudden descent. It then cuts to a different shot so it is impossible to tell how long the maching was in the water. It is easy to assume that there was no delay between the 'landing' and the take off but it is not at all clear. This video also shows a spout of water coming out of a hole in the under nose "radome" as the helicopter rolls over. Maybe the hard landing for some reason caused a hole that allowed water to enter the "radome" and it was this water that caused the failed take-off. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Pilot claims no blame in July crash | Mortimer Schnerd, RN | Piloting | 48 | March 15th 06 09:00 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 05:58 PM |
Is this chopper about to crash? | Trentus | Rotorcraft | 13 | January 12th 04 07:56 AM |