![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:Sz9dg.989012$xm3.907250@attbi_s21... I found the two birds to handle quite differently. The 172 feels positively sprightly compared to a 182, which is more truck-like and nose-heavy. I guess you need to work out. ![]() I did mention the heavier control forces, but really...aside from that, the two planes really are quite similar. There's a lot more to handling qualities than just how much force you have to use. The 182 is really a "trim" plane, meaning that you need to keep that electric trim working throughout all phases of flight -- especially on landing. Nice you had a 182 with electric trim. None of the ones I've flown had it. But anyway, it's not like you can ignore the trim on the 172 either. Any airplane flies SO much better if you include the trim as part of your control of the aircraft. If you've flown your approach correctly and have the trim already set properly, even in the 182 the final flare does not require that much back-pressure. Yes, you can flare it with the trim, but there's really no reason the trim should be that far off in the first place. And in a 182 without electric trim (there are lots of them out there), you really ought to be looking out the front window, rather than leaning down for the flare. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:13:17 -0700, Peter Duniho wrote:
[...] But anyway, it's not like you can ignore the trim on the 172 either. Any airplane flies SO much better if you include the trim as part of your control of the aircraft. After transitioning to the 182, I found I'd a finer touch on the trim. A little out of trim in a 172 is a non-issue. But it gets downright uncomfortable with the few extra knots of the 182. If you've flown your approach correctly and have the trim already set properly, even in the 182 the final flare does not require that much back-pressure. I agree. I just did 9 T&Gs yesterday in a 182 getting back my "I'm going to touch down on that spot there" landings, and I never used the trim again once I'd trimmed for final approach speed. [...] you really ought to be looking out the front window, rather than leaning down for the flare. Laugh One bad habit I had to lose was the "looking down". I didn't do that for trim, but I did for the cowl flaps. I've no idea why. - Andrew |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Gideon" wrote Laugh One bad habit I had to lose was the "looking down". I didn't do that for trim, but I did for the cowl flaps. I've no idea why. That's easy! The cowl flap is down on the bottom of the plane, so you were looking down to see if it were really opening! g -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GAO: Option of Upgrading Additional EA-6Bs Could Reduce Risk in Development of EA-18G. | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 28th 06 02:32 PM |
C172SP engine start with battery switch only? | Robert Winn | Piloting | 8 | April 13th 04 12:31 AM |
Cessna 182S flaps | EDR | Piloting | 7 | January 16th 04 02:37 AM |
1997 Cessna 182S | EDR | Piloting | 2 | December 28th 03 03:21 AM |
Upgrading System | Anthony Acri | Simulators | 1 | July 17th 03 03:18 AM |