![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Borgerson wrote:
In article , says... wrote: Andrew Swallow wrote: Jack Linthicum wrote: [snip] I think that a spread spectrum burst type transmission can be intercepted and given a rough bearing. The money to do this is miniscule in comparison with making Trident missiles into hand grenades. The command post does not move between transmissions. Spread spectrum/frequency hopping systems return to previous frequencies every few seconds. Just use several bursts to home in on the transmitter. ?? You transmit only when you want to issue new command to the swarm, not to control every little thing. You can have minutes without transmission, then 10ms transmission, followed by another long silence. A machine can get a fairly accurate bearing in 10ms. Machines can be made to be very patient so the several minutes is only a minor problem. Several minutes allows wide angle receivers to be replaced by narrow angle receivers sufficiently accurate to allow the targeting of weapons. Narrow angle receivers require larger antennas or arrays of antennas. Granted, that is easier at 900 Mhz than at 9Mhz. Several minutes between hits on a narrowband frequency is different than several hours---particularly if your platform is moving. Then you get into problems with how accurately you know the position and heading of the platform. Much more difficult than DF from a fixed land base. Mobile targets probably have to be attached by a plane that can chase them. And you can also have plenty of cheap decoy trasmitters, just to make it easier to intercept ... something. ;-) Try brute force and ignorance - destroy the lot. How many missiles will that take? About 3 for every transmitter, depending on the accuracy of the DFing. You will soon have a civilian population that is suspicious of decoy transmitters. Andrew Swallow |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GAO: Electronic Warfa Comprehensive Strategy Needed for Suppressing Enemy | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 27th 05 06:23 PM |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 14th 05 08:14 PM |
Air defense (naval and air force) | Mike | Military Aviation | 0 | September 18th 04 04:42 PM |
Naval air defense | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 18th 04 04:42 PM |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |