![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 01:36 01 June 2006, Jack wrote:
Say, Derek, is it true that those V1's were actually self-launching gliders? What do you suppose their true L/D was? I had a look at one in an air museum a few weeks ago. They had very short stubby wings, so probably not that good - 10:1 maybe. I believe that one was fitted with a cockpit and test flown by the famous (and very small) lady glider pilot Hanna Reisch when they were having control problems during its development. Most modern weapons were first developed by the Germans, and the V1 was the forerunner of the cruise missile, albeit with a much cruder guidance system. Fortunately for us in the UK GPS hadn't been invented then. They depended on gyro compasses to keep them running straight and a little propellor on the front to measure the range. When they reached their estimated target distance the motor was cut and the elevators set to full down so they turned into bombs. I am told that if you heard one coming, you didn't worry unless the engine stopped. I believe that British Intelligence put a lot of effort into persuading the Germans that the V1s were overshooting their intended targets, using captured German agents to send back false reports of where they landed. Thus they reduced the range setting so they fell short. Some towns just south of London took a bit of a battering as a result. German agents weren't that difficult to spot - anyone who couldn't pronounce 'th' and 'w' properly was immediately suspect! Derek Copeland |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually the V1 distance actuator just gave down elevator. It was
supposed to go into a power dive, but most often the engine stalled because of fuel starvation from the sudden manouever. There's a V1 in the Smithsonian Air and Space museaum and there also used to be one in the Science Museum in London. The control schematics are available on the web. V1s were also launched from aircraft over the North Sea at targets in northern England, a procedure that proved less than satisfactory. Separation from the host aircraft was not always clean, resulting in the loss of quite a few aircraft. Even those successfully launched went far astray of their targets or fell into the sea. Not bad for such an early innovation, though. My father was an air-raid warden in northern Derbyshire and saw one of the errant V1s going by. Mike Derek Copeland wrote: At 01:36 01 June 2006, Jack wrote: Say, Derek, is it true that those V1's were actually self-launching gliders? What do you suppose their true L/D was? I had a look at one in an air museum a few weeks ago. They had very short stubby wings, so probably not that good - 10:1 maybe. I believe that one was fitted with a cockpit and test flown by the famous (and very small) lady glider pilot Hanna Reisch when they were having control problems during its development. Most modern weapons were first developed by the Germans, and the V1 was the forerunner of the cruise missile, albeit with a much cruder guidance system. Fortunately for us in the UK GPS hadn't been invented then. They depended on gyro compasses to keep them running straight and a little propellor on the front to measure the range. When they reached their estimated target distance the motor was cut and the elevators set to full down so they turned into bombs. I am told that if you heard one coming, you didn't worry unless the engine stopped. I believe that British Intelligence put a lot of effort into persuading the Germans that the V1s were overshooting their intended targets, using captured German agents to send back false reports of where they landed. Thus they reduced the range setting so they fell short. Some towns just south of London took a bit of a battering as a result. German agents weren't that difficult to spot - anyone who couldn't pronounce 'th' and 'w' properly was immediately suspect! Derek Copeland |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Funny you should mention the V1, my father(19 yrs old at the time) who
was in German University in their Aeronatical Program was pulled from school and sent to a factory to assemble the V1 missles. They were built rather hastily he says and it no doubt resulted in less than predicatable performance when trying to set them out to a target. I think the best they could hope for was that they would indeed explode somewhere in England when sent off in that direction. It was more for the demoralization of the enemy, not knowing when or where these things would go, than specific targets and quite frequently they simple exploded in empty fields. Terrors of war are not limited by the imagination, and these are things people would rather forget. Ray Buhr |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, the ground launched V1s were surprisingly accurate for the
technology used. The biggest problem was variability of the thrust produced by the pulse jet motor, hence the use of a simple distance run control rather than a timer. Some V1 s were so fast they were impossible to catch with existing aircraft, but some were slower and could be caught and shot down or tipped up to upset the control system. The most interesting story is the one already mentioned. The area where they were falling was measured by radar, but more reliance was given to reports from German spies (who were captured and feeding false information). The range of V1s was later adjusted based on the false information, steering more of them into empty countryside. Despite the higher damage and death rate of the more sophisticated V2, the V1 caused a lot more distress because of its sound, visability and apparent unstoppability. Mike jb92563 wrote: Funny you should mention the V1, my father(19 yrs old at the time) who was in German University in their Aeronatical Program was pulled from school and sent to a factory to assemble the V1 missles. They were built rather hastily he says and it no doubt resulted in less than predicatable performance when trying to set them out to a target. I think the best they could hope for was that they would indeed explode somewhere in England when sent off in that direction. It was more for the demoralization of the enemy, not knowing when or where these things would go, than specific targets and quite frequently they simple exploded in empty fields. Terrors of war are not limited by the imagination, and these are things people would rather forget. Ray Buhr |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thrice blessed is he
Who has his quarrel just But nine times he Who gets his punch in first not Jim Culp |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MEMORIAL DAY 2005: Her Memory Still Soars | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | May 31st 05 12:07 AM |
Air Force dedicates its memorial 13 years later Go to | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 04 11:54 PM |
The Vietnam Memorial Wall | Ed Rasimus | Military Aviation | 40 | June 29th 04 12:27 AM |
Should Memorial Day and America's War Dead be commercialized? | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 24th 04 02:29 AM |
NAS Glenview IL memorial | John Larson | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 14th 03 09:18 PM |