![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Matt Barrow" wrote: "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=2952 Some of the "refutations" of the IPCC findings have initially sneaked past peer review, only to be caught later: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php...t-do-not-post/ "Thus, while un-peer-reviewed claims should not be given much credence, just because a particular paper has passed through peer review does not absolutely insure that the conclusions are correct or scientifically valid. The "leaks" in the system outlined above unfortunately allow some less-than-ideal work to be published in peer-reviewed journals. This should therefore be a concern when the results of any one particular study are promoted over the conclusions of a larger body of past published work (especially if it is a new study that has not been fully absorbed or assessed by the community). Indeed, this is why scientific assessments such as the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA), or the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, and the independent reports by the National Academy of Sciences, are so important in giving a balanced overview of the state of knowledge in the scientific research community." Guess you didn't read the Q&O article, huh? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote: Guess you didn't read the Q&O article, huh? Guess you didn't read the rest of the article, did you? Still waiting for you to back up your assertion that anthropogenic factors are nothing but noise in global climate change. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Matt Barrow" wrote: Guess you didn't read the Q&O article, huh? Did you read the Q&O article? Guess you didn't read the rest of the article, did you? After three pages of schizophrenia, I gave up. Still waiting for you to back up your assertion that anthropogenic factors are nothing but noise in global climate change. I'm still waiting for you to read the article and respond to the sixteen points I already made. Until then, I'm not going to waste any more time with your typical evasion. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Matt Barrow" wrote: Guess you didn't read the Q&O article, huh? Guess you didn't read the rest of the article, did you? Still waiting for you to back up your assertion that anthropogenic factors are nothing but noise in global climate change. Who are you going to refer to after nutjob Michael Mann?, Michael Moore? Are you going to tell me his movie was viewed by 18 million people? Peer review by a bunch of bought lackies? Hey, using your other analogy, all the creationist **** was "peer reviewed". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any good aviation clip-art? | zingzang | Piloting | 2 | August 11th 05 01:32 AM |
We lost a good one.... | [email protected] | Piloting | 10 | May 28th 05 05:21 AM |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
HAVE YOU HEARD THE GOOD NEWS! | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | January 26th 05 07:08 PM |
Commander gives Navy airframe plan good review | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 03 09:10 PM |