![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() J Haggerty wrote: FAAO 8260.19 requires any arcs in a radar environment to be removed unless they are operationally required. It appears that someone deemed that they were not needed back in 1992, when they were removed from the procedure. GPS was overlayed later, so had nothing to do with removal of the arcs. The ARCs were, and would be, of significant operational benefit at this location. The arcs probably had the annotation "NoPT" on them, since a course reversal would not have been required from the arcs based on the TERPS criteria in effect back in 1992. Do you know of any ARC intitial approach segments that require a course reversal? The ARCs would have certainly had "NoPT" on them with a hold-in-lieu, not "probably." Since ATC was substituting radar flight following (not vectors) combined with center's MIA to protect the GPS equipped aircraft on his flight to MINES, then it would be up to ATC to indicate that the course reversal was not necessary by stating that to the pilot. By what authority? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
where to ask question about approach? | J Haggerty | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 17th 04 06:30 AM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 04:19 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
Established on the approach - Checkride question | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | October 6th 03 04:36 PM |