![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
them to be better (for me) than the bifocals. About 8 months ago I got a
new prescription and had the lenses made at LensCrafters. They never worked very well (the hour glass was too narrow and so peripheral vision was very restricted). I had a new pair made, but this time I told them to use Varilux lenses and not their in house brand (my initial progressives were Varilux). I am now happy again with my new progressives. Thanks, Cary. My family has used Lenscrafters for many years, but they DO have a problem with quality control. A couple of prescriptions back, they made a lens that had a "wave" in it that drove me nuts. I eventually had them re-make it. My current glasses came in earlier this week, but one of the lenses was scratched, so they are re-making it. (They discovered this before I did, thankfully.) Of course, given all the glasses they have made for us over the years (we now ALL wear prescription glasses, with Mary "joining the fun" with her reading glasses), that's a small -- but measurable -- number. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just thought I'd chime in with what I do... I am nearsighted,
astigmatic, and now presbyopic (the old man's eye problem ![]() I have a single vision (distance) lens in my left eye (I fly from the left seat) and a bifocal in the right eye, with the line 2 mm lower than usual, to read my charts with. This has worked well for a few years, but now I may need to move the line up so I can read my instrument panel. The bifocal is just a +1 or so - whatever the least amount they can put in is. I tried higher amounts but they don't work for me since I don't like the different sized views I get from each lens (the bifocal part gives a bigger image). One optometrist would absolutely not fill my prescription - he didn't think it was "a good idea". My wife also had a problem with some glasses she bought (wavy distortions) and he absolutely would not believe her, nor would he look through the lens himself. Alas, he died a week later and we got everything straightened out. Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One optometrist would absolutely not fill my prescription - he didn't
think it was "a good idea". My wife also had a problem with some glasses she bought (wavy distortions) and he absolutely would not believe her, nor would he look through the lens himself. Alas, he died a week later and we got everything straightened out. A harsh, but effective, way to clear up a customer service problem... :-) Well, I'm typing this whilst looking through my new "progressive" lenses. So far, I am VERY impressed. I have both sharpened my distance vision (the doc "tweaked" that prescription a notch for me) *and* I can now see up close. No nausea or vertigo noted. Going up and down steps is fine. The only unusual thing I've noted is this: When sitting at my desk (or a table -- something with a straight edge for reference), if I look down through the "close" vision part of the lenses whilst turning my head from side to side, I can make the table "rock" up and down, back and forth. It's rather disconcerting (and sorta fun, in small doses), but the effect goes away when I focus through the "distance" part of the lens -- so I don't anticipate that this will cause me any undo problems. Thus -- other than my lenses being FAR too thick (like, half again thicker than my former lenses, supposedly due to the "frameless" style Mary selected for me) I like 'em a lot! Thanks to everyone for the input -- it's been very educational. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" "Jose" wrote in message . net... Just thought I'd chime in with what I do... I am nearsighted, astigmatic, and now presbyopic (the old man's eye problem ![]() I have a single vision (distance) lens in my left eye (I fly from the left seat) and a bifocal in the right eye, with the line 2 mm lower than usual, to read my charts with. This has worked well for a few years, but now I may need to move the line up so I can read my instrument panel. The bifocal is just a +1 or so - whatever the least amount they can put in is. I tried higher amounts but they don't work for me since I don't like the different sized views I get from each lens (the bifocal part gives a bigger image). Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article yY4ig.1012801$xm3.53417@attbi_s21,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: Thus -- other than my lenses being FAR too thick (like, half again thicker than my former lenses, supposedly due to the "frameless" style Mary selected for me) I like 'em a lot! My wife's vision is so bad, I have to go with her to pick out the frames because she cannot see what she looks like without lenses in the bare frames. So that I don't have to hear: "What were you thinking when you picked these frames for me?" We now have a digital camera solve that problem. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vision aircraft (2nd try) | Rick Pellicciotti | Home Built | 1 | October 23rd 04 08:15 PM |
Modifying Vision plans for retractable gear... | Chris | Home Built | 1 | February 27th 04 09:23 PM |