Dumb & Dumber

by "Kingfish" Jun 8, 2006 at 10:16 AM


You're right Luney, the FAA must get involved. They must stop
developers from building houses, office buildings, malls etc. in the
departure & arrival paths of airports. I suspect there are no more
occurrences of aircraft crashing now than 40 years ago (although with
the pilot population in decline the figure may be less), but with so
much development on top of airports any crash is more likely to hit a
building now.




Of course you are correct, as always. All development, populuation
growth, etc. must be absolutely subservient to the needs of GA.

My post was meant as tongue-in-cheek (somewhat). Nobody need be
subservient to GA, but just as you take every opportunity to trash
Boyer and AOPA on this forum (ad nauseum) I can use your same absurd
brand of logic to argue that the FAA should, in the interest of
promoting aviation safety, make more of an effort to restrict
developers from encroaching on airports (large & small) thus
endangering building occupants.

Skylune wrote:

Of course you are correct, as always. All development, populuation
growth, etc. must be absolutely subservient to the needs of GA.

Below is a map of your "no build zone." It looks like maybe there is an
area in Nevada that the population should be re-located to. Oh, wait,
that's military space. Oh well...

http://www.gaservingamerica.com/Serv...t_near_you.htm