Nothing good about Ethanol

"Matt Barrow" wrote:



The "peer-reviewed" reports are supposedly running 100% in favor of
HAGW.
Not even evolution gets that high of "consensus".

Well, what does that tell us about the folks who do not agree with the
consensus regarding evolution? Or are they another embattled band of
truth seekers battling the vast wealth and power of the geneticist
empire, the way the What-AGW folks are battling the allpowerful
climatology cartel and their grim desire to destroy the US economy for
murky reasons nobody can fathom?

Ah, Z, you overreached yourself, as usual.

You should not make fun of the creationists since they are your AGW
allies. They think, like Dodger Crappock, that evil Industrialists are
not keeping good stewardship of the earth, and want to scale back
progress. The AGW controversy gives them the perfect opportunity to do
so, under the guise of science.

As for the AGW lobby, their motives are clear: grant money. You
cannot publish a anti-AGW paper as easy as you can a pro-AGW
paper--that's well known.

RL


z wrote:
"Matt Barrow" wrote:



The "peer-reviewed" reports are supposedly running 100% in favor of
HAGW.
Not even evolution gets that high of "consensus".

Well, what does that tell us about the folks who do not agree with the
consensus regarding evolution? Or are they another embattled band of
truth seekers battling the vast wealth and power of the geneticist
empire, the way the What-AGW folks are battling the allpowerful
climatology cartel and their grim desire to destroy the US economy for
murky reasons nobody can fathom?

raylopez99 wrote:

As for the AGW lobby, their motives are clear: grant money. You
cannot publish a anti-AGW paper as easy as you can a pro-AGW
paper--that's well known.

Did you know the Bushies run the government now?
Oh, and by the way, for those forced to pervert their views by
publishing AGW in order to maintain their wealth and power as
climatologists, here is a list of 40-odd think tanks, media outlets,
and consumer, religious, and even civil rights groups which have
received more than $8 million from ExxonMobil to free them to publish
the truth about the AGW lie. Since none of them have taken anything
other than the what-AGW? position since receiving this money, that must
mean that that is the truth! No doubt ExxonMobil would be glad to free
more scientists from bondage if you asked! In fact, looking at the
table, you don't even have to do anything climatology related!
http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2005/05/exxon_chart.html