![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
With all the recent discussion about the landing quirks of various aircraft, I've started to feel I must be missing something. In every airplane I've ever landed, including the "notorious" Mooney and Twin Commanche, I've used the same technique: pull the power off and round out close to the runway, increase back pressure to hold it off as long as it will keep flying, hold the back pressure on roll out. The amount of power I carry might vary a bit, but one airplane lands pretty much like another, it seems to me; I've never had trouble with any of them. I am certainly no great stick-and-rudder man. Am I just too insensitive to detect the differences every one talks about? Dan, I'm with you. I've had folks tell me that a given airplane had to be landed with power otherwise it would crash onto the runway. Except for a few designs that use engine thrust to move air over the wing to provide extra lift, or use vectored thrust to provide lift, this simply makes no sense aerodynamically. The issue is energy management and the source of energy can be airspeed or power. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() After so many hours in the ultra sensitive R22, airplanes are a cinch. Matt Whiting wrote: The issue is energy management and the source of energy can be airspeed or power. Your statement above reminds me of that great video of Hoover doing aerobatics in with power off. What a pilot huh? Monk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flyingmonk wrote:
After so many hours in the ultra sensitive R22, airplanes are a cinch. Matt Whiting wrote: The issue is energy management and the source of energy can be airspeed or power. Your statement above reminds me of that great video of Hoover doing aerobatics in with power off. What a pilot huh? Yes, absolutely. Bob was a joy to watch. He didn't believe all of this crap about needing power to do stuff, even in fairly high performance airplanes. He just went out and did it. Energy is energy, doesn't matter if it is provided by the engine(s) or by airspeed or by altitude. All can be used to achieve the desired outcome. Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob is absolutely one of the world's finest pilots, and probably the
smoothest aerobatic pilot I have ever known. You are correct about the Shrike routine. It was indeed a study in EM (energy management). It's interesting to note for the group at large, that 500RA (Bob's Shrike) was maintained by Byerly Aviation in Florida for the 20 years Bob had the airplane. Byerly made several modifications to the bird that made Bob's wonderful routine possible. 500RA had an accumulator that stored hydraulic pressure that allowed Bob to lower the gear inverted with both fans feathered, and also a special setup for unfeathering both props. Bob would pull both fans back into feather without having to idle back the throttles and mixtures. The restart was made possible by micro-switches that triggered electric pumps that unfeathered the props for him. The accumulator also stored enough pressure to give Bob nosewheel steering for his "dead stick landings". Bob, by his very survival in the low altitude aerobatic environment for as long as he was in it, and flying a variety of airplanes to boot, has established himself as truly one of the world's all time best in the business. Bob was one of the initial charter members of the International Fighter Pilots Fellowship that I founded in 1971. In every contact I have had with him through the years, he has always been a gracious friend and a quiet force in our community. Dudley Henriques "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Flyingmonk wrote: After so many hours in the ultra sensitive R22, airplanes are a cinch. Matt Whiting wrote: The issue is energy management and the source of energy can be airspeed or power. Your statement above reminds me of that great video of Hoover doing aerobatics in with power off. What a pilot huh? Yes, absolutely. Bob was a joy to watch. He didn't believe all of this crap about needing power to do stuff, even in fairly high performance airplanes. He just went out and did it. Energy is energy, doesn't matter if it is provided by the engine(s) or by airspeed or by altitude. All can be used to achieve the desired outcome. Matt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I saw Mr. Hoover and the Shrike at Salina, KS many years
ago. It is very impressive in person, but he missed the spot on the ramp when he rolled back in, by about 6 inches. Thanks for the info on the modifications to the Commander. Jim "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message link.net... | Bob is absolutely one of the world's finest pilots, and probably the | smoothest aerobatic pilot I have ever known. | You are correct about the Shrike routine. It was indeed a study in EM | (energy management). | It's interesting to note for the group at large, that 500RA (Bob's Shrike) | was maintained by Byerly Aviation in Florida for the 20 years Bob had the | airplane. | Byerly made several modifications to the bird that made Bob's wonderful | routine possible. | 500RA had an accumulator that stored hydraulic pressure that allowed Bob to | lower the gear inverted with both fans feathered, and also a special setup | for unfeathering both props. Bob would pull both fans back into feather | without having to idle back the throttles and mixtures. The restart was made | possible by micro-switches that triggered electric pumps that unfeathered | the props for him. | The accumulator also stored enough pressure to give Bob nosewheel steering | for his "dead stick landings". | Bob, by his very survival in the low altitude aerobatic environment for as | long as he was in it, and flying a variety of airplanes to boot, has | established himself as truly one of the world's all time best in the | business. | Bob was one of the initial charter members of the International Fighter | Pilots Fellowship that I founded in 1971. In every contact I have had with | him through the years, he has always been a gracious friend and a quiet | force in our community. | Dudley Henriques | | | | "Matt Whiting" wrote in message | ... | Flyingmonk wrote: | | After so many hours in the ultra sensitive R22, airplanes are a cinch. | | Matt Whiting wrote: | | The issue is energy management and the | source of energy can be airspeed or power. | | | Your statement above reminds me of that great video of Hoover doing | aerobatics in with power off. What a pilot huh? | | Yes, absolutely. Bob was a joy to watch. He didn't believe all of this | crap about needing power to do stuff, even in fairly high performance | airplanes. He just went out and did it. Energy is energy, doesn't matter | if it is provided by the engine(s) or by airspeed or by altitude. All can | be used to achieve the desired outcome. | | | Matt | | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
I saw Mr. Hoover and the Shrike at Salina, KS many years ago. It is very impressive in person, but he missed the spot on the ramp when he rolled back in, by about 6 inches. Oh, the shame if it all. :-) Matt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had the pleasure of flying with Bob about 4 months ago, to a dedication of
a new airport in Idaho. http://temp.corvetteforum.net/c5/kgr...0__medium_.jpg Karl "Curator" N185KG We discussed his straw hat "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message link.net... Bob is absolutely one of the world's finest pilots, and probably the smoothest aerobatic pilot I have ever known. You are correct about the Shrike routine. It was indeed a study in EM (energy management). It's interesting to note for the group at large, that 500RA (Bob's Shrike) was maintained by Byerly Aviation in Florida for the 20 years Bob had the airplane. Byerly made several modifications to the bird that made Bob's wonderful routine possible. 500RA had an accumulator that stored hydraulic pressure that allowed Bob to lower the gear inverted with both fans feathered, and also a special setup for unfeathering both props. Bob would pull both fans back into feather without having to idle back the throttles and mixtures. The restart was made possible by micro-switches that triggered electric pumps that unfeathered the props for him. The accumulator also stored enough pressure to give Bob nosewheel steering for his "dead stick landings". Bob, by his very survival in the low altitude aerobatic environment for as long as he was in it, and flying a variety of airplanes to boot, has established himself as truly one of the world's all time best in the business. Bob was one of the initial charter members of the International Fighter Pilots Fellowship that I founded in 1971. In every contact I have had with him through the years, he has always been a gracious friend and a quiet force in our community. Dudley Henriques "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Flyingmonk wrote: After so many hours in the ultra sensitive R22, airplanes are a cinch. Matt Whiting wrote: The issue is energy management and the source of energy can be airspeed or power. Your statement above reminds me of that great video of Hoover doing aerobatics in with power off. What a pilot huh? Yes, absolutely. Bob was a joy to watch. He didn't believe all of this crap about needing power to do stuff, even in fairly high performance airplanes. He just went out and did it. Energy is energy, doesn't matter if it is provided by the engine(s) or by airspeed or by altitude. All can be used to achieve the desired outcome. Matt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "karl gruber" wrote in message ... I had the pleasure of flying with Bob about 4 months ago, to a dedication of a new airport in Idaho. http://temp.corvetteforum.net/c5/kgr...0__medium_.jpg Karl "Curator" N185KG We discussed his straw hat God, I hope that isn't the same Plantation hat he's been sitting on in the P51 for the last 30 years. That thing must be falling apart by now. I think he's worn it since day one. Some of us even had a bet going at one time that he wore it to bed at night!! :-)) Dudley Henriques |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dudley Henriques wrote: God, I hope that isn't the same Plantation hat he's been sitting on in the P51 for the last 30 years. That thing must be falling apart by now. I think he's worn it since day one. Some of us even had a bet going at one time that he wore it to bed at night!! :-)) Dudley Henriques Dudley, FWIW, they have "a" Panama Hat of Bob's at the NASM Udvar-Hazy facility. Dunno if it's "the" hat or if he just donated one from his collection. Jay B |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message link.net... God, I hope that isn't the same Plantation hat he's been sitting on in the P51 for the last 30 years. That thing must be falling apart by now. I think he's worn it since day one. Some of us even had a bet going at one time that he wore it to bed at night!! :-)) Dudley Henriques He told me that he now auctions them off and the proceeds go to charity. Best, Karl "Curator" N185KG |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Skycraft Landing Light Question | Jay Honeck | Owning | 15 | February 3rd 05 06:49 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Logging x/c time and definition of landing | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 03 08:41 PM |