![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The NEXRAD site, in order to deliver composite reflectivity, must complete a
full scan. That is, one rotation at each elevation of the transmitted beam. That's what takes the time. Why the WARP system is further delayed is pretty much a function of collecting scans from all of the relevant NEXRAD sites and combining them into a mosaic, and I have no idea how much time that takes. Bob "Jon Woellhaf" wrote in message news ![]() Several posters have stated that NEXRAD images displayed on the Garmin 396 are five or more minutes old because that's how long it takes for the images to be processed before they're sent to the XM satellite. What kind of processing could possibly take five minutes? I suspect whomever's in control of the processing is introducing the delay so they can sell seconds old data as a premium service. Jon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Garmin 430 Terrain Avoidance | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | July 22nd 04 03:41 AM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |