![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steven P. McNicoll wrote: Why doesn't ATC like it? Because it conflicts with San Jose's LOUPE ONE departure. The extra three to four minutes hanging over the airport really ****es them off. Especially since they're not expecting it. Why wouldn't the controller provide vectors? I don't know. Some of them are good about it and do provide vectors. I suspect that the others aren't as familiar with the procedure turn requirements as you are, so they don't see the need to do it. You make it sound like it's a burden on them. That's the impression I get. Its probably easier to give a one-time instruction and then concentrate on talking to the airliners that are getting vectors, than to make sure that the little single-engine airplane doesn't get pushed around by the wind and correct the vectors, then issue the turn to intercept at just the right time. The way for them to avoid the procedure turn is to provide vectors to the approach. The way for them to avoid providing vectors to the approach is to accommodate the procedure turn. Those are the only options available, they must choose one of them. I agree with you, but in practice it doesn't always go that way. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Because it conflicts with San Jose's LOUPE ONE departure. The extra three to four minutes hanging over the airport really ****es them off. Especially since they're not expecting it. Then they need to find other employment. Conflict resolution is the reason we have ATC. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
nk.net: Then they need to find other employment. Conflict resolution is the reason we have ATC. But they aren't going to resign over this. That's easy for you to say, but it solves nothing, and will never solve anything. Ain't gonna happen, GI. The way to solve it is to do away with the idiotic requirement to do a precedure turn, but that ain't gonna happen, either. -- Regards, Stan "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Change in AIM wording concerning procedure turn | Kris Kortokrax | Instrument Flight Rules | 208 | October 14th 05 12:58 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Procedure Turn | Bravo8500 | Instrument Flight Rules | 65 | April 22nd 04 03:27 AM |
Unusual Procedure at DFW | Toks Desalu | Piloting | 9 | December 17th 03 05:27 PM |
Instrument Approaches and procedure turns.... | Cecil E. Chapman | Instrument Flight Rules | 58 | September 18th 03 10:40 PM |