A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Opinions on fleet replacement strategies.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 16th 06, 06:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Opinions on fleet replacement strategies.

At 16:54 16 June 2006, Bruce Greef wrote:
Ray Lovinggood wrote:
Bruce,

Have you considered the side-by-side two seater 'Taurus'?

http://www.mcp.com.au/pipistrel-usa/models/taurus.html

Ray Lovinggood
Carrboro, North Carolina

Hi Ray

AS I said I have left many fine options out - and only
quoted the main threads
of the club discussions.

I think the Taurus is perfect, and have gone so far
as to investigate the cost
and waiting list for delivery as a personal toy. But
for a club plane the price
is a deterrent, at 91,000 Euros - versus the TST-14
at 54,000... (Personal
strategy for ownership of one includes winning the
lottery)

Also, for winch launching we would prefer minimum weight.
I don't know if these
are cleared for assisted launch with the engine running.
If this was possible
and safe it would make a difference in some areas.

Self launch might be marginal - both fields are around
5,000' MSL and grass not
tar surface. In both cases the options if the engine
quits on take off are less
than plentiful.


Bruce,

I didn't know the price of either the Taurus or the
TsT-14. Wow.

Please let us know what works out. Our club will someday
need to replace our only two-seater, the Blanik L-13.

We don't have the restrictions you have, but cost is
always a BIG issue. Since our field elevation is 200
feet above sea level and we have a 5,000' paved runway
for aerotowing with a 180 h.p. Cessna 172, aircraft
weight isn't quite a problem for us as it is with you.
Yea, we probably wouldn't want a really heavy ship,
but boy, wouldn't a Duo or a DG-1000 look nice for
us! (Our state just instituted a lottery and I think
our members had better start playing it.)

Ray



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
is the US sailplane fleet shrinking? [email protected] Soaring 8 May 9th 06 07:23 PM
Fleet Air Arm Carriers and Squadrons in the Korean War Mike Naval Aviation 0 October 5th 04 02:58 AM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII Mike Yared Military Aviation 4 October 30th 03 03:09 AM
TKM MX-11 Com true slide replacement ? Rohit Fedane Owning 0 September 21st 03 05:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.