![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john smith" wrote in message ... Conquest Cheyenne Twin Commander A friend bought a Cheyenne three years ago. He said it had the best safety record Did he cite some information, or is that hearsay? and least operating costs as the reasons for its purchase. By the number's I've seen, that's true _per hour_, but not _per mile_. A couple things that bother me about the Cheyenne are that I'm not sure about Piper's long term viability (Do they even support the Cheyenne anymore?), 2nd is that is uses P&W PT-6 engines that are fuel hogs. If not for the P&W's, I'd go for a King Air C90B; there's a lot on the market, they're fairly new (mid 1990's models) and comfortable, and there's some damn good prices on the ones for sale. The Conquest and Twin Commander use the Garrett (now Honeywell) TPE331 and with a -10 conversion, has a 5000 hr TBO and very low fuel flow (less than 85 GPH for both engines). I undestand that Cessna no long supports the Conquest and there are issues with the airframe. I've also considered one of the single engine turboprops, but they all fairly new nad thus still fairly expensive to buy used (well over $2 million). The Twin Commnader has some very impressive performance and cost numbers, but they're ugly, the cabin is pretty narrow, and the cockpit is hard to get into if you're not limber and have a fat ass. The 695 series have had only one fatal accident (guy flew directly into a major TS cell) which is impressive consider they're almost exclusively "owner flown", and they land at less than 90 kts. His previous aircraft was a C310. Did he say what else he looked at? -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO (MTJ) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A friend bought a Cheyenne three years ago. He said it had the best
safety record Did he cite some information, or is that hearsay? He did research, but it has been so long ago that he told me, I do not recall. The Twin Commnader has some very impressive performance and cost numbers, but they're ugly, the cabin is pretty narrow, and the cockpit is hard to get into if you're not limber and have a fat ass. The 695 series have had only one fatal accident (guy flew directly into a major TS cell) which is impressive consider they're almost exclusively "owner flown", and they land at less than 90 kts. There is a fellow that has parked next to us at OSH the last three years with a Commander 680. He says he can put anything in it with full fuel and never be out of balance or overgross. He just had an all glass panel installed last year. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Backup vacuum pump system STC'ed for Cherokee 180 | Chuck | Owning | 6 | September 18th 04 02:30 PM |
Fllight Recorder Wars, Part II: What Backup to Use? | Chip Bearden | Soaring | 13 | March 31st 04 10:10 PM |
Good AI backup, wish me luck | Robert M. Gary | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | March 1st 04 05:36 PM |
Solid State Backup AI | Dan Truesdell | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 15th 04 09:53 PM |
Backup gyros - which do you trust? | Dan Luke | Owning | 46 | July 17th 03 08:06 PM |