A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OAT for RADAR on fighters?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 20th 06, 03:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default OAT for RADAR on fighters?


Ed Rasimus wrote:
On 19 Jun 2006 07:50:02 -0700, "Don McIntyre" wrote:

While reading through Hans-Heiri Stapfer's "Walk Around MiG-21 Fishbed
Part 1" (Squadron-Signal), he makes mention of a temperature probe
mounted low on the nose on an MiG-21F-13. Why would a radar rangefinder
need to know the OAT?


Dunno about MiGs, but every high performance tactical aircraft I ever
dealt with had an OAT input to the Central Air Data Computer (or
whatever it was called on a particular system.) Air temp is a
component of density and that is a factor that impacts range of a
weapon.


AFAIK temperature determins the speed of sound all on its own. Air
density seems to have nothing to do with it unless you get to near
space. Air density of course would determin dymanic pressure.

Technically the speed of sound is the square root of the ratio of air
pressure over air density all multiplied by a constant known as adiatic
exponent of air. However as the ratio of pressure to density is a
constant at a specific temperature temperature is all that is needed.

Best look at it here
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/SpeedOfSoundPressure.pdf

The WW2 British blind bombing system Oboe made compensations for air
density variations so possibly modern radars use it as well, probably
not so much for ranging but for doppler or anti-jamming measures.

Since dum**** fighter drivers don't like numbers the presentation on
the radar screen would be little lines indicating min and max ranges.
When the radar gets a range, the computer whiz-bang calculates how far
the gizmo can get at the current density altitude.


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
www.thunderchief.org
www.thundertales.blogspot.com


  #2  
Old June 20th 06, 04:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default OAT for RADAR on fighters?

On 20 Jun 2006 07:27:56 -0700, "Eunometic"
wrote:


Ed Rasimus wrote:
On 19 Jun 2006 07:50:02 -0700, "Don McIntyre" wrote:

While reading through Hans-Heiri Stapfer's "Walk Around MiG-21 Fishbed
Part 1" (Squadron-Signal), he makes mention of a temperature probe
mounted low on the nose on an MiG-21F-13. Why would a radar rangefinder
need to know the OAT?


Dunno about MiGs, but every high performance tactical aircraft I ever
dealt with had an OAT input to the Central Air Data Computer (or
whatever it was called on a particular system.) Air temp is a
component of density and that is a factor that impacts range of a
weapon.


AFAIK temperature determins the speed of sound all on its own. Air
density seems to have nothing to do with it unless you get to near
space. Air density of course would determin dymanic pressure.

Technically the speed of sound is the square root of the ratio of air
pressure over air density all multiplied by a constant known as adiatic
exponent of air. However as the ratio of pressure to density is a
constant at a specific temperature temperature is all that is needed.

Best look at it here
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/SpeedOfSoundPressure.pdf


You are correct, but irrelevant to the discussion of the relationship
between OAT and radar ranging. Mach is temperature dependent and since
the atmosphere gets colder as you rise, the speed of sound will
change.

But, while high performance aircraft do have mach indicators, they
operate on the basis of airspeed--which leads to an entirely more
complex discussion as we start to grapple with indicated, calibrated,
equivalent and true airspeeds as well as ground speed along with the
trigonometric impact of dive/climb angle relating to bombing.

Highly recommend you don't fly landing approach on mach.

Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
www.thunderchief.org
www.thundertales.blogspot.com
  #3  
Old June 21st 06, 03:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default OAT for RADAR on fighters?

Hey, Ed, M 0.1 is a maximum cruising speed for most old fuds on the
Green Stamp.
BTW I don't think that OAT probe has much to do with the radar. I'd
suspect it's for the air data computer to feed the Machmeter (for some
reason the 21 has a big one, probably so the pilot will fly the exact
Mach commanded by his controller) and the engine and anti-ice systems.
BTW when the 21 was first placed in commission Sov philosophy didn't
allow the interceptor pilot much freedom at all; he was essentially
just the interface between the GCI controller and the two Atolls. I
used to watch their training intercepts on GCI radar at one base i was
at.
Cheers - Walt BJ

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In zeno Restoration 0 October 30th 04 06:21 PM
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In zeno Piloting 0 October 30th 04 06:21 PM
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In zeno Naval Aviation 0 October 30th 04 06:20 PM
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In zeno Instrument Flight Rules 0 October 30th 04 06:20 PM
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In zeno Home Built 0 October 30th 04 06:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.