![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Skylune" wrote in message lkaboutaviation.com... I saw one idiot last weekend in a Cessna that was no more that 300 feet up, just cruising around the area. Clear violation of FARs. But, no there is no agency resposible for enforcement, or even a place to complain to. Where were you, where was he and how were you able to get that 300' tape measure up to his Cessna? Details, Lune, we need details. allen |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That would be the FAA type response. There is no enforcement...
I was in a field, attending a high school commencement. The plane was flying low. I can judge distances. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
outaviation.com, "Skylune" wrote: That would be the FAA type response. There is no enforcement... I was in a field, attending a high school commencement. The plane was flying low. I can judge distances. Glad to hear that you finally graduated! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
by Orval Fairbairn Jun 21, 2006 at 05:52 PM
Glad to hear that you finally graduated! Touche, Orval. ;-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:52:21 -0400, Skylune wrote:
That would be the FAA type response. There is no enforcement... There have been cases of people reporting low-flying aircraft to the FAA, and at least one with which I'm familiar resulted in an enforcement action. Therefore, your statement is factually incorrect. But perhaps some local FSDO staffer provided you with bad information when you called. You did call the FSDO, right? Or are you just guessing? I was in a field, attending a high school commencement. The plane was flying low. I can judge distances. What model plane? After all, a 210 might look like 152 but appear closer than reality. Or were you judging distance against visual cues like sidewalk or street distance or buildings in the background (ie. appearing behind the aircraft)? Or can you judge 300' (vs., for example, 500') through pure stereopsis? Or are you just guessing? - Andrew |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
by Andrew Gideon Jun 21, 2006 at 01:15 PM
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:52:21 -0400, Skylune wrote: That would be the FAA type response. There is no enforcement... There have been cases of people reporting low-flying aircraft to the FAA, and at least one with which I'm familiar resulted in an enforcement action. Therefore, your statement is factually incorrect. But perhaps some local FSDO staffer provided you with bad information when you called. You did call the FSDO, right? Or are you just guessing? I was in a field, attending a high school commencement. The plane was flying low. I can judge distances. What model plane? After all, a 210 might look like 152 but appear closer than reality. Or were you judging distance against visual cues like sidewalk or street distance or buildings in the background (ie. appearing behind the aircraft)? Or can you judge 300' (vs., for example, 500') through pure stereopsis? Or are you just guessing? - Andrew OK. "No enforcement" is an overstatement. There is rare enforcement, usually a high profile event like the idiot who buzzed the beach in Calif last year. As you know, when you call the FAA they need an N#. Difficult to see on the ground. Aha, goes the argument, therefore the plane must have been above 1000 feet. Wrong. Very difficult to catch a small N number on a low flying, fast moving object. Try reading the license plate number off a moving car. And even if you get the N# (and I have), the FAA will want proof, to their standards. Virtually impossible. All the (honest) pilots out there know there are some who routinely bust minimums. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:24:34 -0400, Skylune wrote:
Try reading the license plate number off a moving car. Well, there goes your theory about ground traffic law enforcement. And even if you get the N# (and I have), the FAA will want proof, to their standards. Virtually impossible. Factually incorrect again. In the case with which I'm familiar, at least, the ground observer was presumed to be able to judge the distance at hand (I don't recall why, but I do recall that the reasoning seemed specious). Have you actually discussed this with a FSDO, or are you merely guessing? I asked before, but I noticed a lack of answer. Is everything you write just a guess? - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another home wrecked | Skylune | Piloting | 47 | June 15th 06 02:34 PM |
[Media] A Marine's journey home | Michael Wise | Military Aviation | 0 | May 3rd 04 04:57 AM |
[Media] A Marine's journey home | Michael Wise | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 3rd 04 04:57 AM |
Home Inspection Listings | Patrick Glenn | Home Built | 4 | April 26th 04 11:52 AM |
N94 Airport may expand into mobile home community, locals supportive | William Summers | Piloting | 0 | March 18th 04 03:03 AM |