A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Yet another home wrecked



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 21st 06, 02:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Yet another home wrecked


"Skylune" wrote in message
lkaboutaviation.com...
I saw one idiot last weekend in a Cessna that was no more that 300 feet
up, just cruising around the area. Clear violation of FARs. But, no
there is no agency resposible for enforcement, or even a place to complain
to.


Where were you, where was he and how were you able to get that 300' tape
measure up to his Cessna?

Details, Lune, we need details.

allen


  #2  
Old June 21st 06, 02:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Yet another home wrecked

That would be the FAA type response. There is no enforcement...

I was in a field, attending a high school commencement. The plane was
flying low. I can judge distances.

  #3  
Old June 21st 06, 06:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Yet another home wrecked

In article
outaviation.com,
"Skylune" wrote:

That would be the FAA type response. There is no enforcement...

I was in a field, attending a high school commencement. The plane was
flying low. I can judge distances.


Glad to hear that you finally graduated!
  #4  
Old June 21st 06, 07:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Yet another home wrecked

by Orval Fairbairn Jun 21, 2006 at 05:52 PM




Glad to hear that you finally graduated!


Touche, Orval. ;-)



  #5  
Old June 21st 06, 06:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Yet another home wrecked

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:52:21 -0400, Skylune wrote:

That would be the FAA type response. There is no enforcement...


There have been cases of people reporting low-flying aircraft to the FAA,
and at least one with which I'm familiar resulted in an enforcement
action. Therefore, your statement is factually incorrect.

But perhaps some local FSDO staffer provided you with bad information when
you called. You did call the FSDO, right? Or are you just guessing?

I was in a field, attending a high school commencement. The

plane was
flying low. I can judge distances.


What model plane? After all, a 210 might look like 152 but appear closer
than reality.

Or were you judging distance against visual cues like sidewalk or street
distance or buildings in the background (ie. appearing behind the aircraft)?

Or can you judge 300' (vs., for example, 500') through pure stereopsis?

Or are you just guessing?

- Andrew

  #6  
Old June 21st 06, 07:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Yet another home wrecked

by Andrew Gideon Jun 21, 2006 at 01:15 PM


On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:52:21 -0400, Skylune wrote:

That would be the FAA type response. There is no enforcement...


There have been cases of people reporting low-flying aircraft to the FAA,
and at least one with which I'm familiar resulted in an enforcement
action. Therefore, your statement is factually incorrect.

But perhaps some local FSDO staffer provided you with bad information
when
you called. You did call the FSDO, right? Or are you just guessing?

I was in a field, attending a high school commencement. The

plane was
flying low. I can judge distances.


What model plane? After all, a 210 might look like 152 but appear closer
than reality.

Or were you judging distance against visual cues like sidewalk or street
distance or buildings in the background (ie. appearing behind the
aircraft)?

Or can you judge 300' (vs., for example, 500') through pure stereopsis?

Or are you just guessing?

- Andrew



OK. "No enforcement" is an overstatement. There is rare enforcement,
usually a high profile event like the idiot who buzzed the beach in Calif
last year.

As you know, when you call the FAA they need an N#. Difficult to see on
the ground. Aha, goes the argument, therefore the plane must have been
above 1000 feet. Wrong. Very difficult to catch a small N number on a
low flying, fast moving object. Try reading the license plate number off
a moving car.

And even if you get the N# (and I have), the FAA will want proof, to their
standards. Virtually impossible.

All the (honest) pilots out there know there are some who routinely bust
minimums.





  #7  
Old June 23rd 06, 02:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Yet another home wrecked

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:24:34 -0400, Skylune wrote:

Try reading the license plate number off
a moving car.


Well, there goes your theory about ground traffic law enforcement.

And even if you get the N# (and I have), the FAA will want proof, to their
standards. Virtually impossible.


Factually incorrect again. In the case with which I'm familiar, at least,
the ground observer was presumed to be able to judge the distance at hand
(I don't recall why, but I do recall that the reasoning seemed specious).

Have you actually discussed this with a FSDO, or are you merely
guessing? I asked before, but I noticed a lack of answer. Is everything
you write just a guess?

- Andrew

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another home wrecked Skylune Piloting 47 June 15th 06 02:34 PM
[Media] A Marine's journey home Michael Wise Military Aviation 0 May 3rd 04 04:57 AM
[Media] A Marine's journey home Michael Wise Naval Aviation 0 May 3rd 04 04:57 AM
Home Inspection Listings Patrick Glenn Home Built 4 April 26th 04 11:52 AM
N94 Airport may expand into mobile home community, locals supportive William Summers Piloting 0 March 18th 04 03:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.