![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Wings wrote: Overall, this was a good experiment and I really liked the in-ear approach. Before I spring for $1000 for a Bose, I'd really like to know how the ~$500 in-ear units work. Anybody have any experiences with one of these? I have both a Bose X and a Clarity Aloft in-ear headset. I like them both about the same. They both block out about the same amount of noise. The CA is slightly less comfortable (I wear glasses, and having both the glasses and the CA frame hanging off my ears tends to make them ache after a while) and slightly more annoying to put on (because you have to wad up the little earpieces and wait for them to expand). But on the other hand, the CA set costs half what the Bose set costs. If you take price into account the CA's kick the Bose's butt. The Bose is pretty nice, but it's nowhere near 2x as nice as the CA's. On the other hand, the CA's are nowhere near 2.5x as nice as the $200 non-ANR Peltor headset that I used for ten years before getting the other two. If money is no object, sure, get the CA's. But IMO the non-ANR Peltors are hands-down the best value in aviation headsets. rg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Ron Garret said:
both the glasses and the CA frame hanging off my ears tends to make them ache after a while) and slightly more annoying to put on (because you have to wad up the little earpieces and wait for them to expand). But How often do you have to replace the earpieces? And how much do they cost? I had some soft-foam insert iPod earbuds, and the foam only lasted about a month before it would stop expanding. That's something that scares me about the in-ear headphones. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "What we obtain too cheap we esteem too lightly; it is dearness only that gives everything its value." - Thomas Paine. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Garret wrote in
: In article , Wings wrote: Overall, this was a good experiment and I really liked the in-ear approach. Before I spring for $1000 for a Bose, I'd really like to know how the ~$500 in-ear units work. Anybody have any experiences with one of these? I have both a Bose X and a Clarity Aloft in-ear headset. I like them both about the same. They both block out about the same amount of noise. The CA is slightly less comfortable (I wear glasses, and having both the glasses and the CA frame hanging off my ears tends to make them ache after a while) and slightly more annoying to put on (because you have to wad up the little earpieces and wait for them to expand). But on the other hand, the CA set costs half what the Bose set costs. If you take price into account the CA's kick the Bose's butt. The Bose is pretty nice, but it's nowhere near 2x as nice as the CA's. On the other hand, the CA's are nowhere near 2.5x as nice as the $200 non-ANR Peltor headset that I used for ten years before getting the other two. If money is no object, sure, get the CA's. But IMO the non-ANR Peltors are hands-down the best value in aviation headsets. rg Get the "HALO" from http://www.quiettechnologies.com/ $340 bucks & the best one out there. Tried it at Osh last year, my dad bought one & has flown about 60 hours with it so far. I'm thinking REAL serious about putting my 30 3g's on ebay and getting one... VERY comfortable, quieter than my lightspeeds, no sweaty ears, etc. -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ET wrote:
Get the "HALO" from http://www.quiettechnologies.com/ $340 bucks & the best one out there. thanks for the pointer; how confortable are these things when wearing glasses? --Sylvain |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sylvain wrote in
t: ET wrote: Get the "HALO" from http://www.quiettechnologies.com/ $340 bucks & the best one out there. thanks for the pointer; how confortable are these things when wearing glasses? --Sylvain That one of the reasons to get them grin my lightspeeds go nuts with the gap created by my sunglasses. -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ET wrote:
Get the "HALO" from http://www.quiettechnologies.com/ $340 bucks & the best one out there. Tried it at Osh last year, my dad bought one & has flown about 60 hours with it so far. I'm thinking REAL serious about putting my 30 3g's on ebay and getting one... VERY comfortable, quieter than my lightspeeds, no sweaty ears, etc. Having recently acquired a 30-3G, I'm disappointed to hear that there's something lighter, more comfortable, quieter and cheaper. In fact, I find it difficult to believe that a non-ANR set that looks as light flimsy as the HALO appears on the web site can do a better job. Is there a study (by the manufacturer or anyone else) to substantiate your claim? I'd probably be willing to put up with some additional noise for the additional comfort, but there's no comparison in terms of noise between my 30-3G and my prior non-ANR Peltor. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"rps" wrote in news:1151085977.784241.5860
@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com: ET wrote: Get the "HALO" from http://www.quiettechnologies.com/ $340 bucks & the best one out there. Tried it at Osh last year, my dad bought one & has flown about 60 hours with it so far. I'm thinking REAL serious about putting my 30 3g's on ebay and getting one... VERY comfortable, quieter than my lightspeeds, no sweaty ears, etc. Having recently acquired a 30-3G, I'm disappointed to hear that there's something lighter, more comfortable, quieter and cheaper. In fact, I find it difficult to believe that a non-ANR set that looks as light flimsy as the HALO appears on the web site can do a better job. Is there a study (by the manufacturer or anyone else) to substantiate your claim? I'd probably be willing to put up with some additional noise for the additional comfort, but there's no comparison in terms of noise between my 30-3G and my prior non-ANR Peltor. Well, the guy is an audiologyst, and has some data.. wouldnt call it a "study" though... He has a 30 day guarantee (as does clarity aloft, not sure about the lightspeed in ear units) & he's at Oshkosh, and was just at the SWRFI at Hondo with demo units. Just go up in your plane once with some decent quality foam ear plugs once (about $3.00 at wal-mart in the tool or gun section, squeeze the foam really small, then stick it in your ear as far as you can and let it slowly expand) and tell me how quiet it is... it's the same thing, except with hearing aid quality tiny little speakers. -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying on the Cheap -- Headsets | [email protected] | Home Built | 6 | June 12th 06 05:13 PM |
Entry Level Headsets | Mark Morissette | Piloting | 12 | April 28th 05 02:29 PM |
FS: Pilot Aviation Ultra S-51 Headsets | Slor | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 25th 03 04:31 AM |
ANR Headsets suitable for heli pilots in training? | Kill Bill | Rotorcraft | 6 | September 16th 03 02:17 AM |