![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If a
GPS is a "gadget", then chart and compass are, too. If a chart and compass are gadgets, then so are wings and tail. In my book, the "gadgetness" of an aviation object has some relationship to its necessity, complexity, and pronocity for failure. That which is fundamentally necessary has lower gadgetocity. That which is fluff, complex, and only peripherally related to the fundamental object in question has higher gadgetocity. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote
If a chart and compass are gadgets, then so are wings and tail. In my book, the "gadgetness" of an aviation object has some relationship to its necessity, complexity, and pronocity for failure. That which is fundamentally necessary has lower gadgetocity. That which is fluff, complex, and only peripherally related to the fundamental object in question has higher gadgetocity. As a gadgetologist, I love gadgets -- especially aviation gadgets -- and the higher the gagetocity the better. No single gadget has given me more pleasure than my Garmin 296, both in the plane and in the car. To the OP: I think you need an aviation GPS. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jon Woellhaf" wrote: No single gadget has given me more pleasure than my Garmin 296, both in the plane and in the car. Beware the 396, then. It might be more than you can stand. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|