![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Everett M. Greene wrote:
Sam Spade writes: [snip] However, if both a MEA and a MOCA are prescribed for a particular route or route segment, a person may operate an aircraft below the MEA down to, but not below, the MOCA, when within 22 nautical miles of the VOR concerned (based on the pilot's reasonable estimate of that distance). Idle curiosity: From whence came the magic 22 nm. number? The VOR turns into a pumpkin at 22.1 nm? It is 25 s.m., which is 22 n.m. I can only speculate that in the early days of VOR it became quickly apparent that relief from the MEA when nearing a VOR on an airway with a lower MOCA would provide better descent transitions onto IAPs, etc. The feds probably had a meeting and asked the electronic experts to come up with a distance that would work everywhere. That's how things like that usually come about. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MEA oddity near Harrisburg, PA? | Journeyman | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | May 16th 06 03:42 PM |
MOCA and MEA over water??? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | May 16th 05 08:13 PM |