![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Frank wrote: In America, the 2005 handicaps (the latest list I could find) we Std Cirrus 1.000 LS3 0.953 LS4 0.950 ASW28 0.925 LS8/15 0.925 So, given the current handicap system, allowing 0.925 handicaps would have the effect of negating the entire idea. My .925 quip was tongue-in-cheek; I buried the :-) as part of a parenthetical. I basically think the floor should be LS4 or maybe another antique like the ASW-24 (that thrown in as a barb at my friend JB ) :-))) Certainly there is no incentive to drive forever and spend $2K or so to compete in a contest where there is no chance of winning. Who knows how that would change if there actually was a chance. We won't know until we try. In any case, the SSA supported a 2006 World Class Nationals with only 9 gliders present, and I suspect I could get 9 SC pilots to commit to a meet where they are assured there will be only ?SC gliders in a 0.95 to 1.1 or so range. I used to be a teaching pro in tennis years back. It was funny how some guys would always come in and buy the latest racket, have me fiddle around with new strings, etc. They were sure that "if only" they had the better equipment, they'd be competitive. Year after year, the same guys won the championship, no matter what the equipment. We're all potential champions until we put our talent where our mouth is. To some extent, I feel the same way about folks that say they don't come to the Sports Class nationals because they would have no chance of winning. Try it and see. I mean, if you look back, a well flown Libelle won in 2005 and a well flown K6 would have won in 2004 (excepting his Day 5 landout, Stevenson had a huge lead at Ionia). Also, I'll note that I count 10 (of the 27) gliders at Ionia falling within the sports class range if you include the ASW-24 (otherwise I think it was 8). To some extent, my position on participation from this "latent" group of true Club Class pilots is "I'll believe it when I see it." The idea of running it within the Sports Class nationals for a couple of years seems to have a lot of merit. P3 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Papa3 wrote: Frank wrote: Year after year, the same guys won the championship, no matter what the equipment. We're all potential champions until we put our talent where our mouth is. To some extent, I feel the same way about folks that say they don't come to the Sports Class nationals because they would have no chance of winning. Try it and see. I mean, if you look back, a well flown To some extent, my position on participation from this "latent" group of true Club Class pilots is "I'll believe it when I see it." The idea of running it within the Sports Class nationals for a couple of years seems to have a lot of merit. Yes, I agree on both points. No one really knows what will happen if we try a Club Class Championship within the normal SC Nats, but based on the popularity of this class in Europe, I for one have high hopes. IMHO we still need to adjust the U.S. handicapping system to reflect actual results over the last few years, but maybe that deserves its own thread ;-). Frank (X3) P3 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Qualified crew needed for Sports Class Nationals, Miflin PA | Dick | Soaring | 0 | April 28th 06 03:05 AM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |