![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The FAA has been much more safety minded since they killed
Vince Morrow. Lots of risks can be accepted. But some risks should not be taken or encouraged. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Gary Drescher" wrote in message . .. | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:l8trg.62919$ZW3.30020@dukeread04... | Don't confuse normal airport traffic near a runway with boat | traffic on a lake or harbor. On a lake, a take-off or landing | may come closer than 500 feet to a boat, but it should NEVER | be aimed at that boat. | | Certainly not without the boat occupants' competent cooperation; that would | be reckless. But in this case (assuming the scene was even real), the stunt | performers in the boat *were* cooperating, and presumably had the expertise | to do so safely. | | Your assertion that 91.119 prohibits the takeoff can't be correct, because | otherwise 91.119 would also forbid you to take off or land whenever doing so | would bring you within 500' of a person or vehicle. There's nothing in the | wording of 91.119 that addresses whether or not you are "aimed at" the | object you come close to. | | --Gary | | "Gary Drescher" wrote in message | . .. | | "Jim Macklin" wrote | in message | | news:Bmirg.62828$ZW3.25169@dukeread04... | | Note that just because you are taking off, you still | must | | comply with the regulations. | | | | Huh? According to the beginning of 91.119, parts a, b, | and c *do not | | apply* | | during takeoff or landing. If they did apply, then it | would be illegal | | for | | you to land on a runway whenever another plane is | holding short less than | | 500' from your flight path! | | | | key word, necessary... or was the take-off necessary. | | | | No, that's not a sensible parsing of the qualifier "Except | when necessary | | for takeoff or landing". | | | | A takeoff is virtually never necessary. So if 91.119 meant | what you think it | | does, then you'd be forbidden to take off from a runway if | your flight path | | would bring you within 500' of another aircraft that's on | the ground near | | the runway (on a parallel taxiway, for example). Is that | really the rule you | | follow when you fly? | | | | --Gary | | | | | | | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
8 days around the Great Lakes | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | June 28th 06 05:19 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
ADV: GREAT AVIATION T-SHIRTS & HEAD GEAR | Kates Saloon and Knife Emporium | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 30th 03 11:36 AM |