![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... Macklin, I like you, you are a nice guy. But sometimes you give advice that is way the hell out of your depth. Like this one. Jim, I don't know you except by what you post here, but you've gotta be the most pompous PITA in the Western Hemisphere. "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:AVTtg.67782$ZW3.26133@dukeread04... 104.1 FM is below the aircraft navigation and below the communication assigned frequencies. But there are harmonic signals that you cheap FM transmitter is not screening out. Are you using a wired connection from the PC to the FM transmitter or a WiFi or other radio? Most likely you're getting the interference in that way. You may be in violation of FCC rules. Probably not, with a store-boughten transmitter. And harmonics (which are integral multiples of a fundamental signal) probably have little to do with it. Consider the most probable cause. An FM receiver at 104.1 has a local oscillator at 114.8 MHz to produce an IF of 10.7 MHz. Not only will that beat with 104.1 on the low side of the LO, it will beat with 125.5 on the high side. Most FM receivers have at least a +/- 50 kHz. wide IF strip to allow the stereo subcarrier at 38 kHz. to come through, so 125.45, 125.5, and 125.55 will come through as well. The OP said that he doesn't get any interference when his transmitter is off, so my best place to start looking is the front end of the receiver, where the normal filtering of any decent FM receiver should take care of the "image" problem. However, when a very strong signal (like from a 100 mW legal transmitter) comes blowing into the front end of the receiver from a few feet away, crossmod and intermod are NOT your friend, and no designer in this world can make a brick wall filter that will take care of it. Having said all that, the real problem is to keep whatever small amount of aircraft band com energy is present at the front end from getting into the receiver. And, before we start off on a wild goose chase, I'd advise the OP to get a small handheld aircraft band transceiver or scanner and see if the real transmitter is somewhere around 125.5 MHz.. It is always good to be able to do a math calculation to see exactly what is getting into what before spending a lot of time chasing your tail. For those who say "you can't hear AM on an FM receiver", I say horsefeathers. It may be reduced in volume, it may be distorted, but it will get through. Do the test, tell me what frequency from 118-136.975 MHz. the aircraft is on, and we'll go from there. Jim |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
grin
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... | | "RST Engineering" wrote in message | ... | Macklin, I like you, you are a nice guy. But sometimes you give advice | that is way the hell out of your depth. Like this one. | | Jim, I don't know you except by what you post here, but you've gotta be the | most pompous PITA in the Western Hemisphere. | | | | | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:AVTtg.67782$ZW3.26133@dukeread04... | 104.1 FM is below the aircraft navigation and below the | communication assigned frequencies. But there are harmonic | signals that you cheap FM transmitter is not screening out. | Are you using a wired connection from the PC to the FM | transmitter or a WiFi or other radio? Most likely you're | getting the interference in that way. | | You may be in violation of FCC rules. | | Probably not, with a store-boughten transmitter. And harmonics (which are | integral multiples of a fundamental signal) probably have little to do | with it. | | Consider the most probable cause. An FM receiver at 104.1 has a local | oscillator at 114.8 MHz to produce an IF of 10.7 MHz. Not only will that | beat with 104.1 on the low side of the LO, it will beat with 125.5 on the | high side. Most FM receivers have at least a +/- 50 kHz. wide IF strip to | allow the stereo subcarrier at 38 kHz. to come through, so 125.45, 125.5, | and 125.55 will come through as well. | | The OP said that he doesn't get any interference when his transmitter is | off, so my best place to start looking is the front end of the receiver, | where the normal filtering of any decent FM receiver should take care of | the "image" problem. However, when a very strong signal (like from a 100 | mW legal transmitter) comes blowing into the front end of the receiver | from a few feet away, crossmod and intermod are NOT your friend, and no | designer in this world can make a brick wall filter that will take care of | it. | | Having said all that, the real problem is to keep whatever small amount of | aircraft band com energy is present at the front end from getting into the | receiver. | | And, before we start off on a wild goose chase, I'd advise the OP to get a | small handheld aircraft band transceiver or scanner and see if the real | transmitter is somewhere around 125.5 MHz.. It is always good to be able | to do a math calculation to see exactly what is getting into what before | spending a lot of time chasing your tail. | | For those who say "you can't hear AM on an FM receiver", I say | horsefeathers. It may be reduced in volume, it may be distorted, but it | will get through. | | Do the test, tell me what frequency from 118-136.975 MHz. the aircraft is | on, and we'll go from there. | | Jim | | | | | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt,
Macklin, I like you, you are a nice guy. But sometimes you give advice that is way the hell out of your depth. Like this one. Jim, I don't know you except by what you post here, but you've gotta be the most pompous PITA in the Western Hemisphere. The person involved not-withstanding, what's more pompous, posting about something you don't know much about or saying someone else did that? gd&r -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Home Built | 78 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Owning | 77 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
Radio Interference Information | Ross Richardson | Piloting | 0 | October 17th 03 02:06 PM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Cy Galley | Owning | 23 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |