![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why go and fight it the hard way. This is CLEARLY a violation of
NAFTA as it creates an illegal/unreasonable restraint of trade in products normally sold without restriction. NAFTA has, in one of its many chapters, a federal mandate that all laws erected which create restraints of trade must be abolished. File a motion in Federal court and let the feds do it. I'd also get the FAA involved and screw with the cities ability to get airport funding until it is overturned. Have a great day Scott wrote in message oups.com... I would challenge this regulation as in infringment on Liberty. The concept of Liberty is recognized in the Constitution's Preamble. It embodies the notion that men have the right to do what does not harm the interests of others. It would be a tough case but you might find a sympathetic judge who would say "Noise can be regulated, unslightly messes can be regulated, parking aircraft and airboats in a driveway can be regulated, but a man has the right to do what he wants in his own home or in his own back yard so long as it does not infringe on the rights of others. The City of Jacksonville has not demonstrated how a man working on an airboat or airplane in his own home or yard infringes in any substantial way on the rights of others. Accordingly, such acts are protected by the Constitutional doctrine of Liberty." If you choose to challenge the law, then go straight to federal district court and file a simple, plain complaint alledging that the regulation, as written, deprives you of your liberty under the Constitution Preamble to do what you want in your own home. Stranger cases have been won. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You clearly don't have a clue.
Jim "pbc76049" wrote in message ... Why go and fight it the hard way. This is CLEARLY a violation of NAFTA as it creates an illegal/unreasonable restraint of trade in products normally sold without restriction. NAFTA has, in one of its many chapters, a federal mandate that all laws erected which create restraints of trade must be abolished. File a motion in Federal court and let the feds do it. I'd also get the FAA involved and screw with the cities ability to get airport funding until it is overturned. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Bakersfield Municipal Airport May Be Sold To Developers | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 3 | November 23rd 05 03:00 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |