![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"john smith" wrote Certified? No. Possible? Yes, but you will finish much lower than where you started. Don't encourage that type of behavior with a yes. If he had to ask, he is probably not a competent aerobatic pilot, and a blown barrel roll could stall the plane, or overstress it, so it fails then, or later. I'll bet he is not going to wear a parachute, either, which is required. The answer to rolling a normal category plane should be no, always. We don't want his, or someone else's blood on our hands. I am wondering why, if one may spin a 172, why one may not roll a 172 ... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because Cessna didn't make it in the aerobatic category.
"Terry" wrote in message ... | Morgans wrote: | "john smith" wrote | | Certified? No. | Possible? Yes, but you will finish much lower than where you started. | | Don't encourage that type of behavior with a yes. If he had to ask, he is | probably not a competent aerobatic pilot, and a blown barrel roll could | stall the plane, or overstress it, so it fails then, or later. | | I'll bet he is not going to wear a parachute, either, which is required. | | The answer to rolling a normal category plane should be no, always. | | We don't want his, or someone else's blood on our hands. | | I am wondering why, if one may spin a 172, why one may not roll a 172 ... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:14:38 -0700, Terry wrote
in :: I am wondering why, if one may spin a 172, why one may not roll a 172 ... From: "Jim Macklin" Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Subject: barrel roll in 172 Message-ID: 2SQvg.78944$ZW3.35114@dukeread04 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:31:05 -0500 The issue is recovery from a botched barrel roll, such as in inverted stall followed by a high speed dive and too strong a pull on recovery. For what maximum negative G load is the a C-172 certified in Utility Category? For what absolute maximum negative G load is the C-172 designed? From: Big John Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Subject: barrel roll in 172 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:27:19 -0500 Message-ID: My 1971 172/Skyhawk Owneers [sic] manual shows: Utility Caategory [sic] Maneuvers Max pos G's = 4.4 Chandelles Lazy Eights Steep Turns Spins Stalls (Except whip stalls) Acrobatics that may impose high loads should not be attempted. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | July 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | June 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |