A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

barrel roll in 172



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 21st 06, 09:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Terry[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default barrel roll in 172

Morgans wrote:
"john smith" wrote

Certified? No.
Possible? Yes, but you will finish much lower than where you started.


Don't encourage that type of behavior with a yes. If he had to ask, he is
probably not a competent aerobatic pilot, and a blown barrel roll could
stall the plane, or overstress it, so it fails then, or later.

I'll bet he is not going to wear a parachute, either, which is required.

The answer to rolling a normal category plane should be no, always.

We don't want his, or someone else's blood on our hands.


I am wondering why, if one may spin a 172, why one may not roll a 172 ...
  #2  
Old July 21st 06, 10:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default barrel roll in 172

Because Cessna didn't make it in the aerobatic category.



"Terry" wrote in message
...
| Morgans wrote:
| "john smith" wrote
|
| Certified? No.
| Possible? Yes, but you will finish much lower than
where you started.
|
| Don't encourage that type of behavior with a yes. If he
had to ask, he is
| probably not a competent aerobatic pilot, and a blown
barrel roll could
| stall the plane, or overstress it, so it fails then, or
later.
|
| I'll bet he is not going to wear a parachute, either,
which is required.
|
| The answer to rolling a normal category plane should be
no, always.
|
| We don't want his, or someone else's blood on our hands.
|
| I am wondering why, if one may spin a 172, why one may not
roll a 172 ...


  #3  
Old July 21st 06, 11:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default barrel roll in 172

On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:14:38 -0700, Terry wrote
in ::

I am wondering why, if one may spin a 172, why one may not roll a 172 ...


From: "Jim Macklin"
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting
Subject: barrel roll in 172
Message-ID: 2SQvg.78944$ZW3.35114@dukeread04
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:31:05 -0500

The issue is recovery from a botched barrel roll, such as in
inverted stall followed by a high speed dive and too strong
a pull on recovery.


For what maximum negative G load is the a C-172 certified in Utility
Category? For what absolute maximum negative G load is the C-172
designed?


From: Big John
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting
Subject: barrel roll in 172
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:27:19 -0500
Message-ID:


My 1971 172/Skyhawk Owneers [sic] manual shows:

Utility Caategory [sic] Maneuvers

Max pos G's = 4.4
Chandelles
Lazy Eights
Steep Turns
Spins
Stalls (Except whip stalls)

Acrobatics that may impose high loads should not be attempted.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 October 1st 04 07:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 July 1st 04 08:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 June 1st 04 08:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 1st 04 08:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 April 1st 04 08:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.