![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:14:38 -0700, Terry wrote
in :: I am wondering why, if one may spin a 172, why one may not roll a 172 ... From: "Jim Macklin" Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Subject: barrel roll in 172 Message-ID: 2SQvg.78944$ZW3.35114@dukeread04 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:31:05 -0500 The issue is recovery from a botched barrel roll, such as in inverted stall followed by a high speed dive and too strong a pull on recovery. For what maximum negative G load is the a C-172 certified in Utility Category? For what absolute maximum negative G load is the C-172 designed? From: Big John Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Subject: barrel roll in 172 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:27:19 -0500 Message-ID: My 1971 172/Skyhawk Owneers [sic] manual shows: Utility Caategory [sic] Maneuvers Max pos G's = 4.4 Chandelles Lazy Eights Steep Turns Spins Stalls (Except whip stalls) Acrobatics that may impose high loads should not be attempted. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | July 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | June 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |